HomeDirect TaxCIT(A) Must Give Independent Reasons While Reversing AO; ITAT Need Not Act...

CIT(A) Must Give Independent Reasons While Reversing AO; ITAT Need Not Act as First Appellate Authority: Delhi HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that appellate authorities under the Income Tax framework cannot pass cryptic orders lacking independent reasoning and has held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] must provide its own reasons while overturning findings of the Assessing Officer (AO).  The bench of Justice Dinesh Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Contracts Executed By Sub-Contractors Were Works Contracts And Not Manpower Supply Services, Service Tax Demand Under RCM Unsustainable: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delay by Customs Officer Can’t Defeat Genuine Export: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

S. 122(1A) Can’t Be Invoked Against Individual Who Couldn’t Have Retained Benefit Of Transaction: Bombay HC Stays Recovery 

The Bombay High Court has granted ad-interim relief to an independent director facing penalty...

ED Files PMLA Prosecution Complaint Against Former Madhya Pradesh Excise Officer in ₹18.20 Crore Disproportionate Assets Case

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Bhopal Zonal Office, has filed a Prosecution Complaint under...

More like this

Contracts Executed By Sub-Contractors Were Works Contracts And Not Manpower Supply Services, Service Tax Demand Under RCM Unsustainable: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delay by Customs Officer Can’t Defeat Genuine Export: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

S. 122(1A) Can’t Be Invoked Against Individual Who Couldn’t Have Retained Benefit Of Transaction: Bombay HC Stays Recovery 

The Bombay High Court has granted ad-interim relief to an independent director facing penalty...