Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMadras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea...

Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court consisting of the bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy has granted interim relief to a taxpayer by staying a GST demand order passed under Section 74 of the GST laws after finding a prima facie case in the challenge against the proceedings. 

The dispute raises an important legal issue concerning the validity of initiating proceedings under Section 74 when the earlier intimation was issued under Section 73 and whether the show cause notice contained the necessary ingredients required for invoking allegations of fraud or suppression.

A writ petition was filed challenging an adjudication order dated March 28, 2026, passed by the Joint Commissioner (ST) Intelligence-II, Chennai, for the tax period 2019-20.

The petitioner argued that the GST authorities had initially issued an intimation in Form GST DRC-01A under Section 73 of the GST enactments. However, the final proceedings culminated in an order under Section 74, which deals with cases involving fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. According to the petitioner, such a course of action was legally unsustainable.

The taxpayer further contended that the show cause notice itself did not contain the essential allegations and ingredients necessary for invoking Section 74. It was also argued that the authorities had resorted to Section 74 as an afterthought because proceedings under Section 73 would have been barred by limitation. The petitioner therefore challenged the validity of the entire adjudication process.

Appearing for the State Tax Department, the Government Counsel submitted that the show cause notice had been issued under Section 74 and that issuance of a prior intimation was not mandatory under the GST framework. The Department sought time from the Court to file a detailed counter-affidavit defending the impugned order.

The Court directed that the interim protection would continue until the next date of hearing and posted the matter for further consideration on July 10, 2026.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Madras High Court Stays GST Order Denying ITC on Captive Solar Power Plant

Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...

CBDT Revises Valuer and Income-tax Practitioner Forms, Extends Key Deadlines

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the Income-tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules,...

More like this

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...