HomeDirect TaxCBDT Releases FAQs On Changes Proposed By FM Nirmala Sitharaman In Budget...

CBDT Releases FAQs On Changes Proposed By FM Nirmala Sitharaman In Budget 2025-26 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued the FAQs on the changes proposed by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Budget 2025-26.

The Board has pointed out both the income tax slab rate under the new regime and proposed new regime introduced by Finance Bill, 2025.

The Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 had the following slabs in the new tax regime for person, being an individual or Hindu undivided family or associa􏰀on of persons [other than a co- operative society, or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, or an artificial juridical person referred to in sub-clause (vii) of clause (31) of section 2 

The new slabs proposed are as under:

The Board has clarified that in the proposed new tax regime, the maximum total income for which tax liability for individual taxpayers is NIL is Rs. 12 lakhs.

New tax regime is applicable to person, being an individual or Hindu undivided family or association of persons [other than a co-operative society], or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, or an artificial juridical person referred to in sub-clause (vii) of clause (31) of section 2. Accordingly, change in tax slabs will benefit all these persons.

Read More: FM Proposes TDS Or TCS Rationalization For Easing Difficulties, But Higher TDS Applicable For Non-PAN Holders

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

The Delhi High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings and a Rs. 96.04 crore...

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...