HomeDirect TaxCBDT Specifying Circumstances For Enquiries/Verification Functions

CBDT Specifying Circumstances For Enquiries/Verification Functions

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued order under proviso to Section 144B(5) of the Income Tax Act specifying the circumstances for purposes of enquiries or verification functions.

 For the purpose of enquiry or verification functions referred to in Section 144B(3)(iii) by the Verification Unit:

(i) Non-availability of digital footprint in respect of the assessee or any other person,

(ii) Electronic or Online verification is not possible on account of no response to notice issued to the assessee or any other person,

(iii) Physical verification of assets or premises or persons is required, regardless of the presence of digital footprint; The order comes into force with immediate effect.

Section 144B in the Income Tax Act,1961 has been introduced in the Income Tax Act by National e-Assessment Scheme. The ambitious scheme launched in August 2020 seeks to bring the much-needed reform revolution to the income tax procedure that encumbered tax filing for the common man, fostered corruption, and aided tax evasion.

Download Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Services to Singapore Head Office Not ‘Intermediary Services’: CESTAT 

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Separate Service Tax on Credit-Card Interchange Fee Where Tax Is Already Paid on Entire MDR: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Regional Bench, has set...

TDS Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Deductor Failed to Deposit Tax; Form 16 Not Mandatory Proof: Bombay High Court 

The Bombay High Court has held that TDS credit can’t be denied merely because...

Delhi High Court Refuses to Waive EPCG Average Export Obligation, Directs Exporter to Pursue DGFT Review

The Delhi High Court has declined to grant immediate relief to an exporter seeking...

More like this

Services to Singapore Head Office Not ‘Intermediary Services’: CESTAT 

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Separate Service Tax on Credit-Card Interchange Fee Where Tax Is Already Paid on Entire MDR: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Regional Bench, has set...

TDS Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Deductor Failed to Deposit Tax; Form 16 Not Mandatory Proof: Bombay High Court 

The Bombay High Court has held that TDS credit can’t be denied merely because...