HomeDirect TaxAndhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Assessment Order Lacking DIN

Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Assessment Order Lacking DIN

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed the assessment order lacking Director Identification Number (DIN).

The bench of Justice R Raghunandan Rao and Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam has relied on the decision in the case of Pradeep Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors, in which the Supreme Court, after noticing the provisions of the Act and the circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), had held that an order, which does not contain a DIN number would be non-est and invalid.

The petitioner/assessee was served with the assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, passed by the department, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, for the periods 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2022-23. The order has been challenged by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition.

The assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that the said proceeding did not contain a DIN number.

The court has disposed of the Writ Petition by setting aside the proceedings in Form GST DRC-07 issued by the department, with liberty to the department to conduct fresh assessment, after giving notice to the petitioner and assigning a DIN number to the order. The period from the date of the assessment order, till the date of receipt of this Order shall be excluded for the purposes of limitation. 

Read More: AO Is Not Only Adjudicator But Also an Investigator: Kerala High Court

Case Details

Case Title: Sunrise Marine Services Versus The Assistant Commissioner St and Others

Case No.: Writ Petition No: 1345/2025

Date: 22-01-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: SHAIK JEELANI BASHA

Counsel For Respondent: GP

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...