Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxUPS Is Integral Part Of Computer, 60% Depreciation Allowable: ITAT

UPS Is Integral Part Of Computer, 60% Depreciation Allowable: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that UPS is an integral part of the computer and is entitled to 60% depreciation.

The bench of Sudhir Pareek (Judicial Member) and S Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) has observed that computer accessories and peripherals such as, printers, scanners and server etc. form an integral part of the computer system. In fact, the computer accessories and peripherals cannot be used without the computer. Consequently, as they are the part of the computer system, they are entitled to depreciation at the higher rate of 60%.

The return of income was filed declaring total income of Rs. 8,77,05,840, which was processed under section 143(1). The case was selected for scrutiny and in persuasion statutory notice under section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act was served and after completing the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) computed total income as Rs. 29,15,00,876 by making addition in different heads.

The AO held that the UPS is not an integral part of the computer.

The CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 17,263/- made by disallowing the excess depreciation of computer peripherals.

The department contended that CIT(A) erroneously deleted the addition of Rs. 17,263/- made by disallowing the excess depreciation of computer peripherals by ignoring that the depreciation computer peripherals allowed to at the rate of 15% and not 60%. 

The court upheld the order of the CIT(A).

Case Details

Case Title:  Jubilant Enpro Private Versus Commissioner of Income Tax Circle

Case No.: ITA Nos:- 3197 and 3198/Del/2011

Date: 28.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: Shashvat Dhamija

Counsel For Respondent: Dayainder Singh Sidhu

Read More: This CBDT Circular Bars Tax Dept. From Exploiting Ignorance Of Taxpayers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Missing Train Ticket Can’t Defeat Compensation Claim After Accidental Fall: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has restored ₹8 lakh in compensation to the parents of a...

Rape Conviction Can’t Rest on Inconsistent Testimony and Assumptions About Conduct: Supreme Court Acquits Man

The Supreme Court has set aside a 10-year prison sentence in a 2009 rape...

Retrospective Income Tax Amendment Can’t Be Used to Recall Earlier Tribunal Order: ITAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

CENVAT Credit Reversal on Trading Activity Can’t Be Calculated Using Entire Sale Price: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside a...

More like this

Missing Train Ticket Can’t Defeat Compensation Claim After Accidental Fall: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has restored ₹8 lakh in compensation to the parents of a...

Rape Conviction Can’t Rest on Inconsistent Testimony and Assumptions About Conduct: Supreme Court Acquits Man

The Supreme Court has set aside a 10-year prison sentence in a 2009 rape...

Retrospective Income Tax Amendment Can’t Be Used to Recall Earlier Tribunal Order: ITAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...