Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxUPS Is Integral Part Of Computer, 60% Depreciation Allowable: ITAT

UPS Is Integral Part Of Computer, 60% Depreciation Allowable: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that UPS is an integral part of the computer and is entitled to 60% depreciation.

The bench of Sudhir Pareek (Judicial Member) and S Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) has observed that computer accessories and peripherals such as, printers, scanners and server etc. form an integral part of the computer system. In fact, the computer accessories and peripherals cannot be used without the computer. Consequently, as they are the part of the computer system, they are entitled to depreciation at the higher rate of 60%.

The return of income was filed declaring total income of Rs. 8,77,05,840, which was processed under section 143(1). The case was selected for scrutiny and in persuasion statutory notice under section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act was served and after completing the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) computed total income as Rs. 29,15,00,876 by making addition in different heads.

The AO held that the UPS is not an integral part of the computer.

The CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 17,263/- made by disallowing the excess depreciation of computer peripherals.

The department contended that CIT(A) erroneously deleted the addition of Rs. 17,263/- made by disallowing the excess depreciation of computer peripherals by ignoring that the depreciation computer peripherals allowed to at the rate of 15% and not 60%. 

The court upheld the order of the CIT(A).

Case Details

Case Title:  Jubilant Enpro Private Versus Commissioner of Income Tax Circle

Case No.: ITA Nos:- 3197 and 3198/Del/2011

Date: 28.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: Shashvat Dhamija

Counsel For Respondent: Dayainder Singh Sidhu

Read More: This CBDT Circular Bars Tax Dept. From Exploiting Ignorance Of Taxpayers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRI Officers Competent To Issue Customs SCN: CESTAT Upholds Penalty For Conspiracy To Smuggle Prohibited R-22 Gas

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld customs...

Revenue-Neutral Reverse Charge Liability Cannot Justify Extended Limitation: CESTAT Restricts ₹27.27 Lakh Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

SEBI Can’t Be Compelled Under RTI Act to Collect Information From BSE: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the Securities and Exchange Board of India...

IBBI Must Be Circumspect While Issuing SCN Due to Serious Impact on Insolvency Professionals: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India...

More like this

DRI Officers Competent To Issue Customs SCN: CESTAT Upholds Penalty For Conspiracy To Smuggle Prohibited R-22 Gas

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld customs...

Revenue-Neutral Reverse Charge Liability Cannot Justify Extended Limitation: CESTAT Restricts ₹27.27 Lakh Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

SEBI Can’t Be Compelled Under RTI Act to Collect Information From BSE: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the Securities and Exchange Board of India...