HomeDirect TaxThis CBDT Circular Bars Tax Dept. From Exploiting Ignorance Of Taxpayers

This CBDT Circular Bars Tax Dept. From Exploiting Ignorance Of Taxpayers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The CBDT Circular No. 14 (XL-35) dated 11/04/1955 bars the income tax department from exploiting ignorance of taxpayers.

As the circular the department must not take advantage of ignorance of assessee to collect more tax than what is legitimately due.

In 1995 complaints were received that while ITO’s are prompt in making assessments likely to result into demands and in effecting their recovery, they are lethargic and indifferent in granting refunds and giving reliefs due to assessees under the Act. 

“Dilatoriness or indifference in dealing with refund claims (either under s. 48 or due to appellate, revisional, etc., orders) must be completely avoided so that the public may feel that the Government are actually prompt and careful in the matter of collecting taxes and granting refunds and giving reliefs,” the circular said.

The circular said that the officers of the Department must not take advantage of ignorance of an assessee as to his rights. It is one of their duties to assist a taxpayer in every reasonable way, particularly in the matter of claiming and securing reliefs and in this regard the Officers should take the initiative in guiding a taxpayer where proceedings or other particulars before them indicate that some refund or relief is due to him. 

This attitude would, in the long run, benefit the Department for it would inspire confidence in him that he may be sure of getting a square deal from the Department.

Circular Details

Circular No. 14 (XL-35) 

Date: 11/04/1955

Read More: Provisional Attachment Under GST Can’t Operate Beyond 12 Months: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Subsidiary Assets Can’t Be Treated as Corporate Debtor’s Assets Under IBC: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that assets belonging to subsidiary companies cannot be treated...

Reliance Trust, ISKCON, Hinduja Hospital & Breach Candy Move ITAT Against S. 12AB Cancellation Over ‘Commercial Activity’ Allegations

A major charitable trust operating a leading hospital in Mumbai, along with organisations such...

ITAT Deletes Global Income Addition After Holding No Basis for POEM in India Despite CIT(A)’s Own Findings

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has set aside the addition of...

Income Tax Prosecution Quashed: Madras HC Holds Complaint Without Jurisdiction & Prior Assessment Is Abuse of Process

The Madras High Court has quashed criminal proceedings initiated against an assessee for alleged...

More like this

Subsidiary Assets Can’t Be Treated as Corporate Debtor’s Assets Under IBC: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that assets belonging to subsidiary companies cannot be treated...

Reliance Trust, ISKCON, Hinduja Hospital & Breach Candy Move ITAT Against S. 12AB Cancellation Over ‘Commercial Activity’ Allegations

A major charitable trust operating a leading hospital in Mumbai, along with organisations such...

ITAT Deletes Global Income Addition After Holding No Basis for POEM in India Despite CIT(A)’s Own Findings

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has set aside the addition of...