HomeCompany & PMLAMulti-Brand Retail Disguised as Wholesale Trade: ED Books Myntra for Rs. 1,654...

Multi-Brand Retail Disguised as Wholesale Trade: ED Books Myntra for Rs. 1,654 Crore FDI Violation 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has initiated proceedings against online fashion giant Myntra and its associated companies for allegedly violating foreign direct investment (FDI) regulations to the tune of over ₹1,654 crore.

The Bengaluru Zonal Office of the ED announced on Wednesday that it has registered a case under Section 16(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) against Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd and its related entities. The agency claims the companies misused FDI norms by engaging in multi-brand retail operations under the cover of wholesale cash-and-carry trading.

According to the ED, the action follows credible intelligence suggesting that Myntra and its affiliates structured transactions to bypass FDI rules. The company had reportedly declared its business model as “wholesale cash and carry” to attract FDI but, in practice, routed nearly all sales to a related entity, Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd.

Both Myntra Designs and Vector E-Commerce are part of the same corporate group. The ED alleges that Vector E-Commerce was specifically established to reclassify business-to-customer (B2C) sales as business-to-business (B2B), followed by B2C sales — effectively masking the true nature of retail transactions to comply on paper with FDI guidelines.

Investigators found that Myntra received foreign investment worth ₹1,654.35 crore based on this model. However, the company violated FDI policy amendments from April and September 2010, which limit sales to group companies to just 25% of total turnover under the wholesale trading route. In Myntra’s case, 100% of sales reportedly went to Vector E-Commerce.

The ED said further action under FEMA is underway, and the role of company directors is also being examined as part of the probe.

Read More: Canada’s Biggest Gold Robbery: Kingpin Under ED Lens

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied if Return Was Filed Before Cut-Off Date U/s 16(5): Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that a taxpayer cannot be denied Input Tax...

Supreme Court to Hear GST Dispute on Assignment of Leasehold Rights in July 2026

The long-running controversy surrounding the GSTability of assignment of leasehold rights is once again...

Rooftop Solar Systems Not ‘Works Contracts’: Rajasthan GST Appellate Authority Quashes Rs. 3.05 Crore Demand [READ ORDER]

The Rajasthan Appellate Authority, State Tax, Jodhpur, has set aside a GST demand of...

Cable Operators Liable for Service Tax Despite MSO Paying Tax: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied if Return Was Filed Before Cut-Off Date U/s 16(5): Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that a taxpayer cannot be denied Input Tax...

Supreme Court to Hear GST Dispute on Assignment of Leasehold Rights in July 2026

The long-running controversy surrounding the GSTability of assignment of leasehold rights is once again...

Rooftop Solar Systems Not ‘Works Contracts’: Rajasthan GST Appellate Authority Quashes Rs. 3.05 Crore Demand [READ ORDER]

The Rajasthan Appellate Authority, State Tax, Jodhpur, has set aside a GST demand of...