Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAMulti-Brand Retail Disguised as Wholesale Trade: ED Books Myntra for Rs. 1,654...

Multi-Brand Retail Disguised as Wholesale Trade: ED Books Myntra for Rs. 1,654 Crore FDI Violation 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has initiated proceedings against online fashion giant Myntra and its associated companies for allegedly violating foreign direct investment (FDI) regulations to the tune of over ₹1,654 crore.

The Bengaluru Zonal Office of the ED announced on Wednesday that it has registered a case under Section 16(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) against Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd and its related entities. The agency claims the companies misused FDI norms by engaging in multi-brand retail operations under the cover of wholesale cash-and-carry trading.

According to the ED, the action follows credible intelligence suggesting that Myntra and its affiliates structured transactions to bypass FDI rules. The company had reportedly declared its business model as “wholesale cash and carry” to attract FDI but, in practice, routed nearly all sales to a related entity, Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd.

Both Myntra Designs and Vector E-Commerce are part of the same corporate group. The ED alleges that Vector E-Commerce was specifically established to reclassify business-to-customer (B2C) sales as business-to-business (B2B), followed by B2C sales — effectively masking the true nature of retail transactions to comply on paper with FDI guidelines.

Investigators found that Myntra received foreign investment worth ₹1,654.35 crore based on this model. However, the company violated FDI policy amendments from April and September 2010, which limit sales to group companies to just 25% of total turnover under the wholesale trading route. In Myntra’s case, 100% of sales reportedly went to Vector E-Commerce.

The ED said further action under FEMA is underway, and the role of company directors is also being examined as part of the probe.

Read More: Canada’s Biggest Gold Robbery: Kingpin Under ED Lens

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

Income Tax Officer Can’t Use Last-Minute Valuation Reference to Extend Assessment Limitation: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an Income Tax Department reference made to the...

More like this

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...