HomeCompany & PMLAED Terms Bribery Allegation Tactic to Sabotage Ongoing Money Laundering Investigation

ED Terms Bribery Allegation Tactic to Sabotage Ongoing Money Laundering Investigation

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) dismissed bribery allegations made by Aneesh Babu, a suspect in a money laundering case, suggesting that these claims are an attempt to derail the ongoing investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) recently registered a First Information Report (FIR) against ED Assistant Director Shekhar Kumar and three others: Wilson Varghese from Kochi, Mukesh Kumar from Rajasthan, and Kochi-based chartered accountant Renjith Warrier. The FIR alleges that Wilson approached Babu, demanding money in return for settling the PMLA case against him. Wilson was arrested while accepting a bribe of ₹2 lakh on behalf of Shekhar Kumar, as part of a trap set by Vigilance officials based on Babu’s complaint. Subsequently, Mukesh Kumar and Renjith Warrier were taken into custody following the investigation.

ED sources have indicated that the agency has sought details from the VACB and will examine the matter thoroughly to determine whether any prima facie case exists. They assert that the bribery allegations are a strategic move by Babu to disrupt the ongoing money laundering probe against him.

The money laundering case against Babu is based on findings from the Income Tax Department, which uncovered significant financial irregularities. The ED maintains that the investigation will continue unaffected by the recent allegations.

Read More: Restaurant to Pay Rs. 8,000 for Overcharging Rs. 1 GST on Bottled Water: Bhopal Consumer Forum

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied on Technical Grounds: ITAT Restores Claim Despite 1,933-Day Delay

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...

Withdrawal of S. 12AB Registration Application Doesn’t Bar CIT(E) From Recording Findings During Inquiry: ITAT 

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that where...

Bright Line Test Can’t Be Used for AMP Expenses: ITAT Deletes Rs. 5.19 Crore Transfer Pricing Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a ₹5.19...

Lawyer Seeks Supreme Court’s Intervention Against Delhi Police Over CJP Protest Crackdown; Urges CJI to Take Suo Motu Cognisance

A lawyer has approached the Chief Justice of India (CJI) through a letter petition...

More like this

Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied on Technical Grounds: ITAT Restores Claim Despite 1,933-Day Delay

The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...

Withdrawal of S. 12AB Registration Application Doesn’t Bar CIT(E) From Recording Findings During Inquiry: ITAT 

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that where...

Bright Line Test Can’t Be Used for AMP Expenses: ITAT Deletes Rs. 5.19 Crore Transfer Pricing Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a ₹5.19...