Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLACompany in Liquidation Can’t Be Revived Solely for Real Estate Development: Bombay...

Company in Liquidation Can’t Be Revived Solely for Real Estate Development: Bombay High Court 

Company & PMLA

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Bombay High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has delivered a detailed ruling examining the scope of Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, in the context of a plea to stay the winding-up of Swadeshi Mills Company Ltd.  The principal question before the Court was whether a company ordered to be wound up can be brought out of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Notification

EPF Withdrawal Before Five Years: Form 121 Replaces Forms 15G and 15H for TDS Relief

Employees seeking relief from tax deducted at source (TDS) on eligible Employees’ Provident Fund...
GST

Rs. 1.41 Crore IGST Refund Appeals Must Be Heard by Two-Member Bench as Retrospective Amendment Raises Legal Question: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has directed that eleven...
GST

GST Transitional Credit Recovery Raises Questions Of Law, Requires Division Bench Hearing: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that an...
GST

Missing Supplier’s Invoice Raises Question Of Law In GST Penalty Appeal; GSTAT Division Bench To Hear Dispute

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...

More like this

Notification

EPF Withdrawal Before Five Years: Form 121 Replaces Forms 15G and 15H for TDS Relief

Employees seeking relief from tax deducted at source (TDS) on eligible Employees’ Provident Fund...
GST

Rs. 1.41 Crore IGST Refund Appeals Must Be Heard by Two-Member Bench as Retrospective Amendment Raises Legal Question: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has directed that eleven...
GST

GST Transitional Credit Recovery Raises Questions Of Law, Requires Division Bench Hearing: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that an...