Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLABombay HC Seeks ED Report on 57 Illegal Projects, Slams Civic Officials...

Bombay HC Seeks ED Report on 57 Illegal Projects, Slams Civic Officials for Aiding Unauthorised Construction

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has taken serious note of rampant illegal construction in Mumbai and directed that accountability be fixed on municipal officers who allegedly allowed unauthorized buildings to come up. The Court also called for updates from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and police authorities on related investigations.

The division bench of Justice G.S. Kulkarni and Justice Arif S. Doctor observed that while the demolition of illegal structures, as previously mandated in a 2024 PIL judgment (Sandeep Pandurang Patil v. State of Maharashtra), must proceed, the larger issue of governance failure and official complicity needs urgent attention.

In a recent hearing, the Court permitted flat purchasers affected by an illegal housing project to amend their petition to assert broader legal and constitutional grievances. The residents, who bought flats relying on registered agreements under Maha-RERA, are now facing demolition due to violations committed by the developer and overlooked by civic authorities.

The petitioners’ counsel argued that flat buyers, who acted in good faith, are now suffering due to the “mute spectator” role of municipal officers. “Those responsible for allowing these buildings must face penal and criminal consequences,” she urged.

The Court issued multiple directions.

Firstly, the petitioners may file an amended petition by July 1, 2025.

Secondly, notices are to be served on all parties, including unrepresented respondents, with police assistance.

Thirdly, the Municipal Corporation must file its reply.

Fourthly, the Public Prosecutor was directed to report on the status of FIRs filed in connection with 57 illegal projects, including the current one.

Lastly, the ED may be called upon to inform the Court of progress in its probe.

The court listed the matter on July 4, 2025.

Case Details

Case Title: Tulip Heights Housing Society & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case No.: Writ Petition No. 8590 Of 2025

Date: 27 June 2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Preeti Walimbe

Counsel For Respondent: Savita Prabhune

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...

Rs. 1,800 Shortfall in GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Can’t Defeat Appellate Remedy: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected because the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...