HomeCompany & PMLAAhmedabad CA Accused of Forging Trustees’ Signatures; ED Attaches Properties Worth ₹6.80...

Ahmedabad CA Accused of Forging Trustees’ Signatures; ED Attaches Properties Worth ₹6.80 Crore

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Ahmedabad Zonal Office, has provisionally attached assets worth Rs. 6.80 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, in an ongoing investigation against Chartered Accountant Tehmul Sethna. 

The attached assets include one bungalow and two open plots located in Ahmedabad.

The action stems from an FIR registered by the Navarangpura Police Station, Ahmedabad, which accused Sethna of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and forgery. According to the FIR, Sethna was managing the affairs of a trust named Environment Research & Development Centre, which was established for executing humanitarian and welfare initiatives.

ED’s probe has revealed that Sethna misused his position by unauthorizedly withdrawing Rs. 6.85 crore from the trust’s bank account. These withdrawals were allegedly carried out by forging the signatures of the trustees—without their knowledge or consent.

The investigation further uncovered that the misappropriated funds were routed through a complex web of individuals and entities, many of which were either directly or indirectly under Sethna’s control. This maze of transactions was allegedly crafted to obscure the origin of the money and project the proceeds of crime as legitimate income.

The ED has stated that the provisional attachment of assets is aimed at securing the value of the alleged proceeds of crime while the investigation continues.

Further investigation is underway, and more attachments or prosecutions could follow as the financial trail is further examined.

Read More: ED Notifies Additional Special Courts To Fast-Track PMLA Trials Across States

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied if Return Was Filed Before Cut-Off Date U/s 16(5): Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that a taxpayer cannot be denied Input Tax...

Supreme Court to Hear GST Dispute on Assignment of Leasehold Rights in July 2026

The long-running controversy surrounding the GSTability of assignment of leasehold rights is once again...

Rooftop Solar Systems Not ‘Works Contracts’: Rajasthan GST Appellate Authority Quashes Rs. 3.05 Crore Demand [READ ORDER]

The Rajasthan Appellate Authority, State Tax, Jodhpur, has set aside a GST demand of...

Cable Operators Liable for Service Tax Despite MSO Paying Tax: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied if Return Was Filed Before Cut-Off Date U/s 16(5): Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that a taxpayer cannot be denied Input Tax...

Supreme Court to Hear GST Dispute on Assignment of Leasehold Rights in July 2026

The long-running controversy surrounding the GSTability of assignment of leasehold rights is once again...

Rooftop Solar Systems Not ‘Works Contracts’: Rajasthan GST Appellate Authority Quashes Rs. 3.05 Crore Demand [READ ORDER]

The Rajasthan Appellate Authority, State Tax, Jodhpur, has set aside a GST demand of...