Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCable Operators Liable for Service Tax Despite MSO Paying Tax: CESTAT

Cable Operators Liable for Service Tax Despite MSO Paying Tax: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Cable Operators Liable for Service Tax Despite MSO Paying Tax: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that a local cable operator remains liable to pay service tax on cable services provided to subscribers even where the Multi System Operator (MSO) has already discharged service tax on its own services.  The bench of Sanjiv Srivastava (Technical Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...
Direct Tax

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...
Direct Tax

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...
Indirect Taxes

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

More like this

Direct Tax

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...
Direct Tax

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...
Direct Tax

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...