HomeColumnsHomebuyers To Avoid These Property Buying Mistakes: RERA ALERT

Homebuyers To Avoid These Property Buying Mistakes: RERA ALERT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) was established to protect homebuyers from malpractices in the real estate sector. 

While RERA offers a robust framework for consumer protection, its effectiveness is contingent upon the diligence of the buyer. Certain oversights can render RERA’s safeguards ineffective, leaving buyers vulnerable.

Here are six critical mistakes that can compromise your protection under RERA:

  1. Signing Agreements with Unilateral Clauses

Entering into agreements that heavily favor the builder can limit your ability to seek redress under RERA. Such clauses may restrict your rights and make it challenging to hold the builder accountable for defaults or delays.

  1. Making All-Cash Transactions at the Booking Stage

Opting for cash transactions without official documentation can be detrimental. These dealings lack legal backing, making it difficult to prove payments and seek remedies if disputes arise.

  1. Defaulting on Scheduled Payments

Failing to adhere to the payment schedule can lead to forfeiture clauses being invoked by the builder. This not only jeopardizes your investment but also weakens your position in any legal proceedings.

  1. Accepting Revised Possession Timelines Without Legal Consultation

Agreeing to extended possession dates without seeking legal advice can be risky. Such acceptance may be interpreted as consent, potentially limiting your ability to claim compensation for delays.

  1. Delaying the Filing of Complaints Against the Developer

Postponing the initiation of complaints can undermine your case. Timely action is crucial to ensure that your grievances are addressed effectively under RERA’s provisions.

  1. Relying on Pre-EMI, Subvention, or Rental Return Scheme

These financial schemes, often marketed by developers, may not be recognized or protected under RERA. Engaging in such arrangements without thorough understanding can expose you to financial risks.

Read More: Thiruvananthapuram Customs Seize Foreign Currency Worth Rs. 44.40 Lakhs at Cochin Airport

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 17, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 17, 2026.GSTDGGI MAY RECOMMEND ED PROBE...

GSTN Update Triggers Portal Glitch: Taxpayers Forced to Confirm ‘Tax Liability Breakup’ Tab Despite No Late Invoices

In a recent system update aimed at improving compliance under Section 50 of the...

Maruti Suzuki to Challenge Draft Assessment Order Proposing Rs. 5,786 Crore Income Tax Demand

Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL) on Tuesday disclosed that it has received a Draft...

After JurisHour Report, Fino Payments Bank Shares Crash 19% 

Shares of Fino Payments Bank plunged over 19% on Monday, hitting a fresh record...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 17, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 17, 2026.GSTDGGI MAY RECOMMEND ED PROBE...

GSTN Update Triggers Portal Glitch: Taxpayers Forced to Confirm ‘Tax Liability Breakup’ Tab Despite No Late Invoices

In a recent system update aimed at improving compliance under Section 50 of the...

Maruti Suzuki to Challenge Draft Assessment Order Proposing Rs. 5,786 Crore Income Tax Demand

Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL) on Tuesday disclosed that it has received a Draft...