HomeDirect Tax13-Year Delay in Tax Appeal: ITAT Indore Accepts Commercial Pilot’s Plea, Orders...

13-Year Delay in Tax Appeal: ITAT Indore Accepts Commercial Pilot’s Plea, Orders Fresh Assessment

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has granted relief to commercial pilot Jay Krishnan Nair by setting aside a 13-year-old ex-parte assessment order and the corresponding penalty order, and remanding the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

The Bench of  Paresh M. Joshi (Judicial Member) and Bhagirath Mal Biyani (Accountant Member) ruled, “We are of the considered view that income of the assessee is required to be computed and assessed according to law by following due process… In the instant case… due to default of earlier counsel… no effective steps were taken.”

The case pertains to Assessment Year 2010–11, where Nair’s total income was assessed at Rs. 99.45 lakh under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The original return showed ‘nil’ income. The order, passed in December 2017, was challenged belatedly in July 2023—after a delay of over 2,000 days.

Nair, who worked internationally as a commercial pilot—including a stint with Nigeria Airways—contended that he was unaware of the assessment proceedings and the ex-parte order due to his overseas assignments and a change of address. The delay, he argued, was attributable to his professional obligations and lack of timely communication from his Chartered Accountant (CA).

Significantly, the Tribunal took note of an affidavit filed by Nair’s former CA, R.J. Shah, who admitted to lapses in handling the case and failing to notify Nair of the assessment developments. The Tribunal emphasized that both the assessment and first appellate orders lacked merit-based adjudication and had resulted in serious prejudice to the assessee.

The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh, reasoned order on a de novo basis within six months. The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were also remanded, being consequential to the main assessment.

Case Details

Case Title: Jay Krishnan Nair Versus NFAC

Case No.: ITA Nos. 538 &732/Ind/2024

Date:  24.06.2025

Counsel For  Petitioner:  Gagan Tiwari, AR

Counsel For Respondent: Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR

Read More: COVID Limitation Relief Applies Even ITR Filing: Madhya Pradesh HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Allows Collaborator To Invoke Arbitration Clause Despite Being Non-Signatory To Main Contract

The Supreme Court has held that a collaborator essential to the execution of a...

Supreme Court Upholds Sale of SC/ST Granted Land, Quashes Karnataka Authorities’ Orders Due to Peculiar Facts

The Supreme Court has set aside concurrent orders passed by Karnataka authorities and the...

Supreme Court Refuses Blanket Regularisation of Jharkhand Para Teachers, Directs State To Fill 50% Reserved Vacancies Every Academic Year

The Supreme Court has refused to grant blanket regularisation to thousands of para teachers...

Consumers Can’t Be Burdened With Power Plant Costs After Supply Ceases; SC Restores DERC Order Against Tata Power

The Supreme Court has held that electricity consumers cannot be compelled to bear tariff...

More like this

Supreme Court Allows Collaborator To Invoke Arbitration Clause Despite Being Non-Signatory To Main Contract

The Supreme Court has held that a collaborator essential to the execution of a...

Supreme Court Upholds Sale of SC/ST Granted Land, Quashes Karnataka Authorities’ Orders Due to Peculiar Facts

The Supreme Court has set aside concurrent orders passed by Karnataka authorities and the...

Supreme Court Refuses Blanket Regularisation of Jharkhand Para Teachers, Directs State To Fill 50% Reserved Vacancies Every Academic Year

The Supreme Court has refused to grant blanket regularisation to thousands of para teachers...