Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAED Charges Four in Rs. 734 Crore Fake GST Credit Scam; Rs....

ED Charges Four in Rs. 734 Crore Fake GST Credit Scam; Rs. 5,000 Crore Fake Invoicing Network Busted

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a prosecution complaint before the Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Ranchi against four key individuals accused of orchestrating a massive ₹734 crore input tax credit (ITC) fraud linked to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime.

The accused—Shiva Kumar Deora, Mohit Deora, Amit Kumar Gupta, and Amit Agrawal—were arrested on May 8 and are currently in judicial custody. According to the ED, these individuals were at the helm of a sophisticated operation involving the creation and use of fake shell entities to generate and circulate fraudulent tax credits.

The ED’s investigation, initiated on the basis of several complaints from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Jamshedpur, uncovered a web of around 135 shell companies floated on paper. These entities were used to issue bogus invoices worth approximately Rs. 5,000 crore, despite there being no actual movement of goods or services.

By generating and selling fake ITC valued at Rs. 734 crore, the syndicate allowed various firms to fraudulently reduce their GST liabilities. The ED noted that the fake credits were sold on commission to willing buyers, effectively enabling tax evasion on a massive scale.

So far, the ED has traced and attached immovable properties worth Rs. 5.29 crore, seized cash totaling Rs. 8.98 crore, and frozen bank balances amounting to Rs. 62.90 lakh as part of its crackdown on the racket.

Additionally, extensive search operations were conducted in multiple locations across Jharkhand and West Bengal to trace the money trail and gather evidence.

The prosecution complaint marks a significant development in one of the largest GST-related money laundering cases currently under investigation, highlighting the growing nexus between tax fraud and organized financial crime.

Read More: Arvind Kumar Appointed as Technical Member (State) to Uttar Pradesh Bench of GSTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...