HomeCase CompilationExcise Duty Weekly Flashback: 11 To 17 May 2025

Excise Duty Weekly Flashback: 11 To 17 May 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Excise Duty Weekly Flashback for the period 11 to 17 May, 2025.

Calcutta High Court

Excise Duty Under Sugar Cess Act Can’t Be Claimed As Cenvat Credit: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has held that the excise duty under Sugar Cess Act cannot be claimed as cenvat credit.

CESTAT

Charge Of Clandestine Removal Is A Serious One Must Have Corroborative Evidences: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the charge of clandestine removal which is a serious one has not been established by the Revenue with corroborative evidence.

Excise Dept. Fails To Prove Non-Receipt of Goods, Cenvat Credit Rightly Claimed by Manufacturer: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the manufacturer has rightly claimed the cenvat credit as the excise department failed to prove non-receipt of goods.

Charges Of Clandestine Removal Unsustainable Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the charges of clandestine removal unsustainable without corroboration of recovered documents.

Read More: Customs Weekly Flashback: 11 To 17 May 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...