Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMadras High Court Condones 285-Day Delay in GST Appeal on Payment of...

Madras High Court Condones 285-Day Delay in GST Appeal on Payment of Additional  5% Tax In Pre-Deposit

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has condoned 285-day delay in GST appeal on payment of additional  5% tax in pre-deposit.

The bench of  Justice Krishnan Ramasamy has observed that the reason assigned by the petitioner, for the delay in filing the appeal against the summary order, appears to be genuine. 

The petitioner submitted that the ex parte impugned summary order came to be passed by the respondent. Being unaware of the said summary order, the petitioner has failed to file their appeal within time. Thereafter, the appeal against the aforesaid summary order was preferred by the petitioner with a delay of 285 days. Since the delay is beyond the condonable period, the appeal was rejected by the respondent, vide rejection order dated 04.11.2024, on the aspect of limitation. Hence, he prayed to condone the delay in filing the appeal on any terms including any condition of additional pre-deposit.

On the other hand, the department submits that the delay, in filing the appeal, has occurred only due to the fault on the part of the petitioner and requests the Court to pass appropriate orders.

The court has held that though the petitioner had already paid 10% of the disputed tax amount as pre-deposit while filing the appeal, considering the delay of 30 days, the Court directed the petitioner to pay additional 5% of the disputed tax amount, as agreed by the petitioner, to the respondents.

The court directed that upon payment of the said amount, the Appellate Authority is directed to take the appeal on record and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing an sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S.Hitech Cnc Engineering Versus Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax) (FAC)

Case No.: W.P.No.16902 of 2025 & W.M.P.No.19177 of 2025

Date:  03/06/2026

Counsel For Petitioner: R.Reshma

Counsel For Respondent: K.Vasanthamala

Read More: Nationwide GST Data Leak Exposed: CA Body Flags Racket, Demands Finance Ministry Crackdown

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

GST Notice Issued After Regular Assessment Deadline Stayed as Court Questions Basis for Invoking S. 74: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay in appeal against a GST...

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Alone Can’t Undo Rs. 76,750 ITC Relief: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Lucknow Bench has dismissed a departmental...

Govt. to Evaluate RoSCTL and RoDTEP Export Schemes Amid Changing Global Trade Conditions

NITI Aayog’s proposed study will examine whether the two tax remission schemes are helping...

More like this

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

GST Notice Issued After Regular Assessment Deadline Stayed as Court Questions Basis for Invoking S. 74: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has granted an interim stay in appeal against a GST...

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Alone Can’t Undo Rs. 76,750 ITC Relief: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Lucknow Bench has dismissed a departmental...