Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTRs. 5,712 Crore GST Demand Against Paytm's First Games Stayed: Supreme Court

Rs. 5,712 Crore GST Demand Against Paytm’s First Games Stayed: Supreme Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings related to a ₹5,712 crore Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand issued against First Games, a real-money gaming platform owned by Paytm’s parent company, One97 Communications.

The apex court’s order came in response to a writ petition filed by First Games on May 3, 2025, challenging the massive GST demand raised by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). The stay was granted on May 23, 2025, and formally communicated to One97 Communications by First Games on May 24.

In a regulatory filing disclosed on Saturday, One97 Communications confirmed:

“We hereby inform you that First Games has notified us on 24 May 2025 at 10:44 am IST that in the writ petition… filed by First Games challenging the said SCN, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has, on 23 May 2025, stayed the proceedings of the SCN.”

The Tax Dispute

The case centres around the method of calculating GST on online gaming platforms. On April 28, 2025, the DGGI issued a show-cause notice to First Games, proposing a GST liability of ₹5,712 crore, along with interest and penalties. The notice covered the period from January 2018 to March 2023.

The core issue is whether GST should be levied at 18 per cent on gross gaming revenue (GGR)—that is, the commission or platform fees earned by the company—or at 28 per cent on the total face value of bets placed by users. The DGGI’s demand assumes the latter, significantly inflating the tax burden.

First Games has contested this position, arguing against the retrospective application of the GST Council’s October 2023 amendment, which mandates 28 per cent GST on the full entry amount for all online games, irrespective of whether they are classified as games of skill or chance. The company has sought relief similar to what has been granted in other related cases.

Industry-Wide Impact

This legal tussle is part of a broader regulatory battle impacting the entire online gaming industry. The GST Council’s 2023 amendment to the Central GST Act aimed to resolve ambiguities that had led to inconsistent tax treatment and litigation. Before the amendment, online games of skill were taxed at 18 per cent on GGR, while games of chance were subject to 28 per cent on the full bet amount. However, the overlap between skill and chance in games like poker and fantasy sports created classification challenges.

By making the 28 per cent rate applicable across the board and retrospectively from August 2017, the amendment has led to aggressive tax enforcement by authorities. Multiple companies have received similar show-cause notices under Section 74 of the CGST Act, prompting a wave of legal challenges.

One97 Communications has clarified that the issue is not unique to First Games and reflects a larger, ongoing debate about the taxation of digital gaming services in India.

As the matter now lies before the Supreme Court, the decision will likely have far-reaching consequences for how online gaming businesses are taxed and regulated in the country.

Read More: Book Review: From Shadows to Light – The Truth of Netaji’s Mortal End – By Sumeru Roy Chaudhury

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...