Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCBIC Imposes Provisional Anti-Dumping Duty on Aluminium Foil Imports from China

CBIC Imposes Provisional Anti-Dumping Duty on Aluminium Foil Imports from China

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on aluminium foil up to 80 microns, excluding aluminium foil below 5.5 microns for non-capacitor applications, imported from China.

Key Highlights of the Anti-Dumping Duty

The Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) found that Chinese exporters were dumping aluminium foil in India at prices lower than normal value, causing material injury to domestic manufacturers.

The provisional anti-dumping duty has been imposed under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, in line with the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment, and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty) Rules, 1995.

The duty rates vary by producer, ranging from USD 619 to USD 873 per metric ton.

The duty will be in force for six months unless revoked or amended earlier.

Why Has India Imposed This Anti-Dumping Duty?

The Indian aluminium industry has been facing unfair competition from cheap Chinese imports, impacting domestic production. The investigation concluded that:

  1. Chinese exporters were selling aluminium foil at below-market prices, leading to price distortions in India.
  2. This has resulted in significant losses for Indian aluminium manufacturers, causing job losses and financial distress.
  3. The duty aims to level the playing field for Indian manufacturers and protect domestic industry from unfair trade practices.

Which Aluminium Products Are Affected?

The anti-dumping duty applies to aluminium foil falling under tariff items:
7607 11 10, 7607 11 90, 7607 19 10, 7607 19 91, 7607 19 92, 7607 19 93, 7607 19 94, 7607 19 95, 7607 19 99, 7607 20 10, and 7607 20 90.

However, it excludes specific applications, such as:

  • Aluminium foil below 5.5 microns for non-capacitor applications
  • Aluminium foil used in electrolytic capacitors
  • Aluminium foil for beer bottles, insulation, and automotive heat exchangers

Notification Details

Notification No. 02/2025-Customs

Date: 17/03/2025

Read More: Madras High Court Upholds Income Tax Assessment Transfer From ITO Theni to DCIT Kochi For Coordinated Investigation

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

NCLT Quashed ROC’s Rejection of DIR-12, Directs Fresh Verification in Director Removal Dispute

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that while the Registrar...

Religious References Alone Can’t Deny S. 80G Approval: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Reopening for AY 2015-16 Invalid After Six-Year Limitation: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...

Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes SVLDRS Rejection, Directs Fresh Consideration of Interest Waiver Claim

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application...

More like this

NCLT Quashed ROC’s Rejection of DIR-12, Directs Fresh Verification in Director Removal Dispute

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that while the Registrar...

Religious References Alone Can’t Deny S. 80G Approval: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Reopening for AY 2015-16 Invalid After Six-Year Limitation: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...