Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. Mistakes ‘Interest’ For ‘Instrument’: ITAT Deletes ₹2.45 Lakh Addition 

Income Tax Dept. Mistakes ‘Interest’ For ‘Instrument’: ITAT Deletes ₹2.45 Lakh Addition 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted addition of Rs. 2.45 Lakh as the income tax dept. mistakes ‘interest’ for ‘instrument’.

The bench of Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member) observed that the assessee’s Andhra Bank account was credited with ₹2.45 lakh, with the transaction description reading “Inst03551 Clg Axis Bank Ltd,” which was treated by the authorities below to be an interest credit. However, upon reviewing the same, Inst03551 represents the “instrument” and not the interest as alleged by the department.

During the assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the assessee’s bank account with Andhra Bank was credited with ₹10 lakh from M/s KR Shelter on account of commission, which was not offered to tax. Similarly, the Andhra Bank account was credited with ₹2.45 lakh as interest income, which was also not disclosed for tax purposes. Consequently, the AO added ₹12.45 lakh to the total income of the assessee.

On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the AO.

Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed the appeal before ITAT.

The assessee submitted that the amount received from M/s KR Shelter has been duly disclosed in the books of accounts and offered to tax. Accordingly, the addition made by the authorities below is not sustainable.

The assessee submitted that the amount of Rs. 2.45 lakh was not representing the interest as alleged by the revenue. As such the impugned amount represents the encashment of the LIC which was duly disclosed in the books of accounts.

The tribunal quashed the finding of the learned CIT-A and directed the AO to delete the addition made by him for Rs. 2.45 lakhs on account of interest income. 

Case Details

Case Title:  Nanjudareddy Gopala Reddy Versus ITO

Case No.: ITA No. 2192/Bang/2024

Date: 20/02/2025

Counsel For Appellant: Inder Paul Bansal

Counsel For Respondent: Nandini Das

Read More: ITAT Imposes Cost Of Rs. 500 On Assessee Citing Unexplained Delay In Filing Income Tax Appeal

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

Supreme Court Grants Bail To Dry-Fruit Trader Accused Of GST Evasion

The Supreme Court has granted bail to a dry-fruit trader accused of evading GST...

Mumbai Court Allows Accused in Alleged Gold Diversion Case to Visit Hong Kong, Keeps DRI Lookout Circular in Abeyance [READ ORDER]

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has permitted an accused in an...

More like this

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

Supreme Court Grants Bail To Dry-Fruit Trader Accused Of GST Evasion

The Supreme Court has granted bail to a dry-fruit trader accused of evading GST...