HomeGSTDelhi High Court Stays Proceedings Under Show Cause Notice Issued By GST...

Delhi High Court Stays Proceedings Under Show Cause Notice Issued By GST Anti-Evasion Wing

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has stayed the proceedings under show cause notice issued by GST anti-evasion wing.

The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Dharmesh Sharma has observed that issued notice to the respondents and granted stay on proceedings under show cause notice issued by Anti-evasion. The principle ground of challenge was that such transfer is illegal, being without jurisdiction, and beyond statutory provisions. No reliance can be placed on internal guidelines/audit manual. 

The petitioner is a registered taxpayer. An audit was conducted under section 65 for FY 2017-2018 to 2022-2023. The petitioner replied. An Audit report (in Form ADT-02) was issued. The petitioner replied. Audit sought trial balance for Delhi zone only. 

The petitioner submitted that one trial balance is maintained for the entire country as an entity. The case was transferred by the audit to the anti evasion wing citing non co-operation by the petitioner. A show cause notice came to be issued by the Anti-evasion under section 74 alleging suppression of facts. 

The notice was challenged in writ petition.

The petitioner contended that the audit was being undertaken by respondent department. Thereafter, in terms of a letter dated 26 February 2024, the respondent appears to have transferred the ongoing proceedings to the Anti-Evasion Wing of the Central Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate. The statute confers no such power of transfer upon the department.

The court restrained the department from taking further proceedings pursuant to the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 02 August 2024.

Read More: SVLDR Scheme Extends To Redemption Fine: Bombay High Court

Case Details

Case Title: M/S Siemens Healthcare Pvt Ltd  Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: W.P.(C) 16562/2024 & CM APPL. 70043/2024 (Stay)

Date: 04/12/2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Bharat Raichandani

Counsel For Respondent: Ghanshyam Mishra

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...