Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationIGST | Advertising Services Provided By Advertising Companies To Foreign Clients Not...

IGST | Advertising Services Provided By Advertising Companies To Foreign Clients Not Performance-Based Services: CBIC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that the advertising services provided by the advertising companies to foreign clients cannot be considered as performance-based services as per section 13(3)of the IGST Act.

A foreign company or firm hires an advertising company/agency in India for advertisement of its goods or services and may enter into a comprehensive agreement with the advertising company/agency encompassing all the issues related to advertising services ranging from media planning, investment planning for the same, creating and designing content, strategizing for maximum customer reach, the identification of media owners, dealing with media owners, procuring media space, etc. for displaying/broadcasting/printing of advertisement including monitoring of the progress of the same. In such a case, the advertising agency provides a one stop solution to the client who outsources the entire activity to the agency.

Media owners raise invoices to the advertising agency for inventory costs, which are then paid by the advertising agency. Subsequently, the advertising agency raises invoice to the foreign client for the rendered advertising services and receives the payments in foreign exchange from the foreign client. 

Issue Raised – Whether the advertising services provided by the advertising companies to foreign clients can be considered as performance-based services as per section 13(3)of the IGST Act?

The place of supply of performance based services is provided in section 13(3) of IGST Act. The provisions of clause (a) of the said sub-section pertain to the services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services. However, in the instant matter, there does not appear to be any such involvement of goods which are required to be physically available with supplier of advertising services. Therefore, the said provisions of clause (a) of the said sub-section cannot be made applicable for determination of place of supply of advertising services.

Read More: CGST Act | Target Audience Of Advertisement In India Can’t Be Considered As ‘Recipient’: CBIC

Clause of (b) of sub-section (3) of section 13(3)(b) of IGST Act provides that the place of supply shall be the location where the services are actually performed in case, where, services are supplied to an individual, represented either as the recipient of services or a person acting on behalf of the recipient, and which requires the physical presence of the recipient or the person acting on his behalf, with the supplier for the supply of services.

The supply of advertising services does not require physical presence of the recipient (foreign client or representative or a person acting on his behalf) with the advertising company for availing the said advertising services. Thus, the said supply of advertising services cannot be considered as being covered under section 13(3)(b) of the IGST Act for being considered as the services actually performed in India in terms of the said section.

The Board clarified that the place of supply of advertising services in such cases can neither be determined as per the provision of section 13(3)(a) nor as per the provisions of section 13(3)(b) of IGST Act.

Circular No. 230/24/2024-GST

Date: 10/09/2024

Read Circular

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Negative Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger Permissible for GST Recovery U/s 79: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST authorities may resort to negative...

GST ITC Rejection on Property Constructed for Leasing Can’t Ignore Supreme Court’s Safari Retreats Ruling: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside assessment orders rejecting input tax credit (ITC)...

CBIC Reviews JNCH Preparedness for 100% Non-Intrusive Inspection of Import Containers

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has reviewed the preparedness of...

WHEN WELFARE TAKES A BACK SEAT: INTERIM CHILD CUSTODY, COMITY AND STEREOTYPICAL NOTIONS OF MATRIMONY

The Article “WHEN WELFARE TAKES A BACK SEAT: INTERIM CHILD CUSTODY, COMITY AND STEREOTYPICAL...

More like this

Negative Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger Permissible for GST Recovery U/s 79: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST authorities may resort to negative...

GST ITC Rejection on Property Constructed for Leasing Can’t Ignore Supreme Court’s Safari Retreats Ruling: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside assessment orders rejecting input tax credit (ITC)...

CBIC Reviews JNCH Preparedness for 100% Non-Intrusive Inspection of Import Containers

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has reviewed the preparedness of...