Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. Drops Proposed ₹17.32 Crore Addition After Reviewing Taxpayer’s Documents

Income Tax Dept. Drops Proposed ₹17.32 Crore Addition After Reviewing Taxpayer’s Documents

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Income Tax Department has completed a search-linked block assessment without making any addition to an Ahmedabad taxpayer’s income, after a show cause notice proposed treating receipts totalling ₹17.32 crore from a political party and a charitable trust as unexplained income.

In an assessment order dated September 30, 2026, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(2), Ahmedabad, accepted the taxpayer’s return declaring nil undisclosed income for the block period from April 1, 2019, to September 23, 2025. The assessing officer recorded that the taxpayer’s submissions and documents had been carefully examined and that no adverse inference was drawn.

Buy Now: 195+ ITC Judgements Along With GSTAT Rulings – 2017 To 2026

Search Linked To Alleged Donation Accommodation Entries

The proceedings followed a search under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the taxpayer’s residence on September 23, 2025, in connection with an investigation involving Bhartiya Sant Mat Party and Karmaputra Charitable Trust. According to the assessment order, no documents or valuables were seized from the residential premises.

The order described the wider investigation as a coordinated action against certain Registered Unrecognised Political Parties, charitable trusts and associated entities allegedly involved in facilitating inadmissible tax deductions through donation accommodation entries.

According to the department’s account of the investigation, funds were allegedly routed through political parties, trusts and other entities before being converted into cash after deduction of commission. The order referred to alleged misuse of deductions under Sections 80GGB, 80GGC, 80G and 35(1)(ii) of the Act.

These allegations formed the background to the assessment proceedings. The final order, however, made no addition in the individual taxpayer’s case.

Notice Proposed ₹17.32 Crore Addition Under Section 69A

A show cause notice dated September 26, 2026, questioned two sets of alleged receipts: ₹14,51,27,789 from Satta Kalyan Party during financial year 2021–22 and ₹2,81,00,200 from Karmaputra Charitable Trust during financial year 2022–23.

The notice asked the taxpayer to explain why the combined amount of ₹17,32,27,989 should not be treated as unexplained receipts under Section 69A and added to income for the relevant assessment years.

For the alleged receipts from Satta Kalyan Party, the notice referred to information arising from an earlier search conducted on September 7, 2022, involving a group of Registered Unrecognised Political Parties in Ahmedabad.

The department also relied on an extract of the charitable trust’s audit report to question the second set of receipts and sought a written explanation supported by documentary evidence.

Earlier Scrutiny Had Identified An Assessment-Year Mismatch

The September 26 notice recorded that the alleged political-party transactions had previously been examined during scrutiny for assessment year 2023–24.

According to the notice, an earlier assessment order dated March 10, 2025, had found that the ₹14.51 crore transactions related to financial year 2021–22, corresponding to assessment year 2022–23, rather than the year under scrutiny.

Consequently, the amount was not added in assessment year 2023–24, and the returned income of ₹4,27,600 was accepted. The September 2026 notice sought to examine the transactions in the block assessment on the ground that they fell within the block period.

Taxpayer’s Explanation Accepted In Final Assessment

Following the September 2025 search, the department issued a notice under Section 158BC dated July 6, 2026. The taxpayer filed a block return on September 15, 2026, declaring nil undisclosed income.

The final order recorded several notices and responses during the assessment proceedings, including a response dated September 28, 2026, to the September 26 show cause notice.

After examining the material on record and the taxpayer’s submissions, the assessing officer accepted the returned income and made no addition for the block period. The order determined both the undisclosed income declared by the taxpayer and the undisclosed income assessed by the department at nil.

The assessment was completed under Section 143(3), read with Section 158BC, with prior approval of the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Range-1, Ahmedabad. The accompanying demand notice under Section 156 specified nil payable, and the computation sheet recorded zero tax liability.

The final order does not explain in detail how the taxpayer answered each allegation concerning the ₹17.32 crore receipts. Its stated conclusion is that examination of the submissions and documents warranted no adverse inference. The outcome is therefore specific to this taxpayer’s block assessment and does not constitute a general finding on donations to political parties or charitable trusts.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Godown Rent Attracts 18% GST Even When Used Exclusively For Exempt Agricultural Warehousing: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Godown Rent Attracts 18% GST Even When Used Exclusively For Exempt Agricultural Warehousing: AAR

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that rent paid for godowns...

GST Demand Passed Ignoring Filed Reply Quashed; Bank Attachment to Be Lifted on 10% Deposit: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST demand order that recorded that...

Can Earlier GST Proceedings Confer Territorial Jurisdiction To Challenge Parallel Probes And Bank Attachment In Another State? Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has declined to entertain a company’s petition challenging alleged parallel...

GST On Minimum-Balance Banking Services: ICICI Bank Gets ₹229.14 Crore SCN

ICICI Bank has disclosed receipt of a show cause notice seeking ₹229.14 crore in...

More like this

Godown Rent Attracts 18% GST Even When Used Exclusively For Exempt Agricultural Warehousing: AAR

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that rent paid for godowns...

GST Demand Passed Ignoring Filed Reply Quashed; Bank Attachment to Be Lifted on 10% Deposit: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST demand order that recorded that...

Can Earlier GST Proceedings Confer Territorial Jurisdiction To Challenge Parallel Probes And Bank Attachment In Another State? Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has declined to entertain a company’s petition challenging alleged parallel...