HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 AUGUST, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 AUGUST, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 18, 2026.

GST

  1. GST SCN DEFICIENCIES CAN BE RAISED IN APPEAL: SUPREME COURT DECLINES INTERFERENCE
  2. WHETHER CASH CAN BE SEIZED AS ‘THING’ UNDER SECTION 67(2)? CALCUTTA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CASH SEIZURE ORDER 
  3. WHETHER CASH CAN BE SEIZED AS ‘THING’ UNDER SECTION 67(2)? CALCUTTA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CASH SEIZURE ORDER
  4. TESTING THE LIMITATIONS OF SECTION 107(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017: AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY?
  5. NO FURTHER GST RECOVERY AFTER MORE THAN 10% DEMAND RECOVERED: CALCUTTA HIGH COURT LIFTS BANK ACCOUNT ATTACHMENT PENDING APPEAL
  6. PRINTING OF EDUCATIONAL EXAMINATION MATERIALS EXEMPT FROM GST WHEN SUPPLIED AS PART OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES: AAR

Service Tax

  1. AIRCRAFT HIRING TAXABLE AS SUPPLY OF TANGIBLE GOODS: CESTAT

Customs Duty

  1. AHMEDABAD CUSTOMS SEIZES GOLD JEWELLERY FROM PASSENGER ARRIVING FROM SHARJAH
  2. ORISSA HIGH COURT GRANTS 8 WEEKS TO ASSESSEE TO APPROACH CESTAT AFTER SUPREME COURT’S REVISED CANON INDIA RULING
  3. S. 37 NDPS ACT CONDITIONS MUST BE STRICTLY SATISFIED: ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT REJECTS BAIL IN 207.20-KG PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCE CASE
  4. REGULAR CRIMINAL COURT CAN’T RELEASE CUSTOMS-SEIZED GOODS UNDER BNSS: GAUHATI HC 
  5. CESTAT UPHOLDS EPCG CUSTOMS DUTY DEMAND AFTER FLOOD-DAMAGED MACHINERY FAILS EXPORT OBLIGATION
  6. 1 YEAR LIMITATION IMPOSED BY CUSTOMS NOTIFICATION CANNOT DEFEAT REFUND CLAIM: CESTAT 
  7. DGFT REVISES IMPORT POLICY FOR CLEAR FLOAT GLASS; IMPORTS BELOW RS. 34,000 PER MT CIF VALUE RESTRICTED
  8. SUGAR EXPORT BAN UPHELD: BOMBAY HIGH COURT SAYS PRIVATE CONTRACTS AND ADVANCE PAYMENTS CAN’T OVERRIDE GOVT. POLICY

Income Tax

  1. S. 271AAB NOTICES INVALID FOR NOT SPECIFYING THE EXACT CHARGE: ITAT
  2. ITAT CONDONES 1,947-DAY DELAY IN S. 12A REGISTRATION CASE, REMANDS MATTER TO CIT(E) FOR FRESH DECISION
  3. MERE IGNORANCE OF PROCEEDINGS INSUFFICIENT FOR CONDONATION OF 4-YEAR DELAY IN INCOME TAX APPEALS: ITAT 
  4. HIGHER AUTHORITY’S SANCTION MANDATORY FOR INITIATING REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS AFTER 3 YEARS: ITAT
  5. ITAT ALLOWS S. 80P DEDUCTION ON BANK INTEREST EARNED BY CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
  6. CPC CAN’T MAKE S. 143(1) ADJUSTMENT ON DEBATABLE EMPLOYEE PF/ESI CONTRIBUTION ISSUE BEFORE SUPREME COURT’S CHECKMATE RULING: ITAT
  7. 365-DAY STAY LIMIT U/S 254(2A) NOT ABSOLUTE WHEN ASSESSEE ISN’T RESPONSIBLE FOR DELAY: ALLAHABAD HC
  8. CAN COURTS ASSESS SUFFICIENCY OF MATERIAL BEHIND A LOOK-OUT CIRCULAR? DELHI HIGH COURT DEFINES LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
  9. INCOME TAX DEPT. LAUNCHES NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION OF SUSPICIOUS FOREIGN REMITTANCES

PMLA

  1. SUPREME COURT RESTRAINS CBI, ED FROM FILING REPORT IN RAHUL GANDHI ASSETS CASE; ALLAHABAD HC PROCEEDINGS DEFERRED

Others

  1. CBIC CADRE RESTRUCTURING 2026
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GSTAT Flags Jurisdictional Defects and Natural Justice Violation, Directs UP Tax Department to Ensure Timely Portal Compliance

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Division Bench, Court No. I, has...

Madras High Court Remits GST Interest Dispute for Fresh Adjudication, Directs Officer to Reconsider S. 74 Limitation in Rs. 72.25 Lakh Demand

The Madras High Court has remitted a GST dispute to the jurisdictional tax authority...

GST Assessees Can Claim Exclusion of Time Spent on Bona Fide Rectification Proceedings While Filing Appeals: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the principles underlying Section 14 of the...

GSTAT Admits Challenge to Two-Year Refund Limitation for Tax Paid by Mistake

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Patna Bench, has admitted an appeal...

More like this

GSTAT Flags Jurisdictional Defects and Natural Justice Violation, Directs UP Tax Department to Ensure Timely Portal Compliance

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Division Bench, Court No. I, has...

Madras High Court Remits GST Interest Dispute for Fresh Adjudication, Directs Officer to Reconsider S. 74 Limitation in Rs. 72.25 Lakh Demand

The Madras High Court has remitted a GST dispute to the jurisdictional tax authority...

GST Assessees Can Claim Exclusion of Time Spent on Bona Fide Rectification Proceedings While Filing Appeals: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the principles underlying Section 14 of the...