The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the Commissioner cannot invoke revisionary powers under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act merely because a different view is possible when the Assessing Officer has already conducted detailed inquiries during assessment proceedings. 

The Bench of Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member) and M. Balaganesh (Accountant Member) after an extensive hearing spread across twelve sittings. The appeals arose from assessments framed under Sections 153A and 143(3) following a search conducted under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act.

The case originated after a search and seizure operation conducted on the taxpayer in November 2004. Pursuant to the search, assessments were completed under Section 153A. Subsequently, the Commissioner exercised revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263, alleging that the assessment orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue on multiple issues, including deduction under Section 10B, tax deduction at source on payments to non-residents, software imports, royalty payments, allocation of expenses, repairs, interest claims, and other business expenditures.

Buy Now: INCOME TAX E-COMPILATION – JUNE 2026

The taxpayer challenged the Commissioner’s action, contending that every disputed issue had already been thoroughly examined by the Assessing Officer during the original assessment proceedings and therefore could not be reopened through revision proceedings merely because the Commissioner held a different opinion.

The Tribunal examined the voluminous assessment records, correspondence, notices, replies, and documentary evidence placed before the Assessing Officer during the search assessments. It found that the Assessing Officer had issued detailed questionnaires, sought explanations, verified documents, and consciously taken decisions on various disputed issues.

Accordingly, the Tribunal held that where an Assessing Officer has conducted proper inquiry and taken a plausible view, the Commissioner cannot invoke Section 263 simply because he believes another view would have been more appropriate. Revisionary jurisdiction cannot be exercised as a substitute for the Commissioner’s own opinion on matters already investigated during assessment.

One of the major issues before the Tribunal related to purchases of computer-based training products from an overseas supplier after the expiry of a commercial agreement.

The Revenue had questioned the genuineness of these purchases. However, the Tribunal noted several undisputed facts supporting the taxpayer’s claim:

• Purchase orders and invoices existed.
• Bills of Entry established actual import of the products into India.
• Payments were made through normal banking channels.
• The overseas supplier was an unrelated third party.
• The imported products were used for business purposes, including training, library reference, and subsequent sales.
• Revenue generated from later use and sale of these products had already been offered to tax.
• The Revenue had not produced any incriminating material discovered during the search to establish that the transactions were sham or fictitious.

In these circumstances, the Tribunal held that the purchases were genuine commercial transactions undertaken for business purposes. It affirmed the deletion of the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and dismissed the Revenue’s objections on this issue.

The department had separately challenged the relief granted for Assessment Year 2002-03. After considering the facts and evidence, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue’s contentions and dismissed its appeal in entirety, thereby affirming the relief granted by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the disputed issues.

Final Outcome

The Tribunal passed the following final directions:

• Appeals for Assessment Years 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 were partly allowed.
• The Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2002-03 was dismissed.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Read More: Unsigned GST Assessment Order Invalid: Andhra Pradesh High Court