Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxPerson Named in Warrant, Not Premises Owner, Is ‘Searched Person’ Under Income...

Person Named in Warrant, Not Premises Owner, Is ‘Searched Person’ Under Income Tax Act: Karnataka HC

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
karnataka hc

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court held that a search under Section 132 is fundamentally person-centric and not premises-centric, by restoring proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench of Justice S.G.Pandit and Justice K. V. Aravind noted that the warrant of authorization and “reason to believe” were recorded exclusively in the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...
GST

GST Cross-Empowerment Doesn’t Require Separate Notification; Parallel Proceedings on Same Issue Remain Barred: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the absence of a separate notification under...
GST

GST Penalty U/s 122(1A) Can’t Apply to Pre-2021 Transactions; Unregistered Beneficiaries Also Covered: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that personal penalties under Section 122(1A) of the...
GST

One-Line Rejection Of Audit Reply Alone No Ground To Quash GST SCN: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with a GST show cause notice...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...
GST

GST Cross-Empowerment Doesn’t Require Separate Notification; Parallel Proceedings on Same Issue Remain Barred: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the absence of a separate notification under...
GST

GST Penalty U/s 122(1A) Can’t Apply to Pre-2021 Transactions; Unregistered Beneficiaries Also Covered: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that personal penalties under Section 122(1A) of the...