Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesForfeiture of Hotel Booking Advances Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT 

Forfeiture of Hotel Booking Advances Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT 

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Forfeiture of Hotel Booking Advances Not Taxable as Service: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, has held that forfeited advance amounts collected by hotels on cancellation of bookings cannot be subjected to service tax, as such amounts are in the nature of compensation and not consideration for any service. The Bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and P. V….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Gifts And Incentives To Doctors: Stronger Checks Needed On Unethical Pharma Marketing: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to constitute a committee within two weeks...
Supreme Court

Criminal Breach Of Trust Can’t Be Proved Without Evidence Of Entrustment And Dishonest Intent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has restored the acquittal of a former Telephone Department cashier accused...
Direct Tax

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...
Columns

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...

More like this

Supreme Court

Gifts And Incentives To Doctors: Stronger Checks Needed On Unethical Pharma Marketing: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to constitute a committee within two weeks...
Supreme Court

Criminal Breach Of Trust Can’t Be Proved Without Evidence Of Entrustment And Dishonest Intent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has restored the acquittal of a former Telephone Department cashier accused...
Direct Tax

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...