Customs Dept. Relied On Emails, Computer Printouts Without Following Mandatory Procedure U/S 138C: CESTAT Quashes Demand

HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Dept. Relied On Emails, Computer Printouts Without Following Mandatory Procedure U/S...

Customs Dept. Relied On Emails, Computer Printouts Without Following Mandatory Procedure U/S 138C: CESTAT Quashes Demand

Indirect Taxes

Published on

08/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Customs Dept. Relied On Emails, Computer Printouts Without Following Mandatory Procedure U/S 138C: CESTAT Quashes Demand

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a demand of Rs. 43.01 lakh in alleged differential customs duty citing denial of cross-examination and inadmissible electronic evidence. The bench of Angad Prasad (Judicial Member) and A.K. Jyotishi (Technical Member) has observed that the emails and computer printouts…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Customs Dept. Relied On Emails, Computer Printouts Without Following Mandatory Procedure U/S 138C: CESTAT Quashes Demand

Membership Required

Latest articles

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

Bona Fide Mistakes Shouldn’t Defeat Substantive Tax Rights: Karnataka High Court Allows Correction of GST DRC-03 Filing Error

More like this

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories