Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesRouter Components Are ‘Parts’, Not Network Interface Cards; CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty...

Router Components Are ‘Parts’, Not Network Interface Cards; CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Demand on Bharti Airtel

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside a major customs duty demand against Bharti Airtel Limited, ruling that key components of Juniper routers imported by the telecom major are “parts of routers” and not independent “network interface cards” (NICs).  The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Full Enhanced Land Compensation Must Be Deposited; Landowners Can Withdraw 8.33% Pending Appeal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Meerut Development Authority to deposit the entire enhanced...

GST Appeal Can Proceed After Delayed Payment of Admitted Dues; Filing Date Shifts to Full Compliance: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Raipur, has allowed...

Credit Notes Reported As ITC Can’t Sustain ₹9.56 Lakh GST Demand Where No Tax Was Lost: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Bengaluru Bench, has set aside a...

Creditor Facing 99.28% Insolvency Haircut Can Set Off Entire ₹12.26 Crore Claim Against Recovery Demand: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an operational creditor whose claim was settled at...

More like this

Full Enhanced Land Compensation Must Be Deposited; Landowners Can Withdraw 8.33% Pending Appeal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Meerut Development Authority to deposit the entire enhanced...

GST Appeal Can Proceed After Delayed Payment of Admitted Dues; Filing Date Shifts to Full Compliance: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Raipur, has allowed...

Credit Notes Reported As ITC Can’t Sustain ₹9.56 Lakh GST Demand Where No Tax Was Lost: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Bengaluru Bench, has set aside a...