Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Bars Examination of Child Witness 7 Years After Incident; Cites...

Supreme Court Bars Examination of Child Witness 7 Years After Incident; Cites Risks of Tutoring and Memory Distortion

Other Laws

Published on

By Amit Sharma
Supreme Court Bars Examination of Child Witness 7 Years After Incident; Cites Risks of Tutoring and Memory Distortion

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court of India has set aside a High Court order that permitted the prosecution to examine a minor child as a witness seven years after her mother’s death. The Bench, comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Augustine George Masih, ruled that summoning a child witness at such a belated stage, especially when her…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

VAT Return Scrutiny Can’t Bypass 5 Year Limitation Or Mandatory Notice Requirement: Meghalaya High Court 

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed VAT scrutiny reports and notices covering tax periods...
Notification

GSTN Introduces Multistate Registration Facility to Apply Across States Under 1 PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a “Multistate Registration” facility on...
Columns

PAN Name Mismatch? TRACES Verification Can Help Before Tax Registration

Taxpayers and businesses preparing for Income Tax portal registration, TDS-related registration, GST registration, ICEGATE...
GST

No GST Penalty For Missing E-Way Bill Vehicle Details During Eligible Movement To Transporter Within 50 Km: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has held...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

VAT Return Scrutiny Can’t Bypass 5 Year Limitation Or Mandatory Notice Requirement: Meghalaya High Court 

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed VAT scrutiny reports and notices covering tax periods...
Notification

GSTN Introduces Multistate Registration Facility to Apply Across States Under 1 PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a “Multistate Registration” facility on...
Columns

PAN Name Mismatch? TRACES Verification Can Help Before Tax Registration

Taxpayers and businesses preparing for Income Tax portal registration, TDS-related registration, GST registration, ICEGATE...