HomeNotificationGST Annual Return Clarification: How to Report ITC Reversed in FY 2024-25...

GST Annual Return Clarification: How to Report ITC Reversed in FY 2024-25 Pertaining to FY 2023-24

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has issued the clarification that has emerged regarding the reporting of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in the annual GST return, addressing confusion over how to disclose ITC pertaining to FY 2023-24 but reversed in FY 2024-25. It has been clarified that such reversals are not required to be disclosed anywhere in GSTR-9 for FY 2024-25.

The confusion primarily arose because several taxpayers had availed ITC related to FY 2023-24 belatedly during FY 2024-25 and subsequently reversed it due to ineligibility, reconciliation discrepancies or documentary deficiencies. This led to uncertainty over whether the reversal should be reduced from the ITC reported in Table 6A1, disclosed under Table 7, or excluded entirely from the annual return of FY 2024-25.

It has now been clarified that Table 6A1 of GSTR-9 captures only the ITC pertaining to FY 2024-25, irrespective of the period of availment. Similarly, Table 7 is meant only for reversals relating to the ITC of the current year, that is, FY 2024-25. Consequently, if ITC belonging to FY 2023-24 is reversed in FY 2024-25, such reversal does not fall within the reporting parameters of the annual return for FY 2024-25.

This clarification ensures that taxpayers do not duplicate reporting or create inconsistencies between GSTR-9 and the monthly GSTR-3B filings. It also aligns with the principle that the annual return is intended to summarise the credits of the financial year to which it pertains, rather than adjustments concerning past periods.

Tax professionals advise maintaining separate year-wise ITC ledgers to avoid overlap between prior year credits claimed in the current year, current year reversals and audit-based adjustments. Such segregation will assist in accurate reconciliation between GSTR-3B, GSTR-9 and GSTR-2B, particularly in the backdrop of increased scrutiny of ITC claims.

With annual return compliance timelines approaching, the clarification provides much-needed certainty for taxpayers handling past-year credit reversals in the current financial cycle.

Click Here To Read Advisory

Read More: Table 7J of GSTR-9 Not Matching Table 4C of GSTR-3B? GSTN Issues Clarification on ITC Mismatch for FY 2024–25

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

The Delhi High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings and a Rs. 96.04 crore...

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...