Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationGSTR-9 Clarification: No Reporting Needed in Table 7 for Reversal of FY...

GSTR-9 Clarification: No Reporting Needed in Table 7 for Reversal of FY 2023–24 ITC in FY 2024–25

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has clarified that annual return reporting under GST has brought relief to taxpayers struggling with disclosures related to ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) of FY 2023–24 that was later availed and reversed in FY 2024–25.

As per the clarification, ITC pertaining to FY 2023–24 but availed belatedly in FY 2024–25 must be reported only in Table 6A1 of GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25. This aligns with the return instructions which require reporting of any prior-year ITC claimed during the current year in Table 6.

However, the department has categorically stated that while such ITC may have been reversed in FY 2024–25 through Table 4B(1) of GSTR-3B, no separate disclosure is required in Table 7 of GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25.
Table 7 is meant exclusively for reporting ITC reversals pertaining to the current financial year only.

Officials further clarified that Tables 6B to 6H and 7A to 7H must capture only the ITC movement relevant to FY 2024–25 and not earlier years. Therefore, the reversal entry linked to FY 2023–24 will not form part of the reversal section of the annual return for FY 2024–25.

Key Takeaway for Taxpayers

  • Report prior-year ITC availed in FY 2024–25: Table 6A1
  • No reporting of corresponding reversal in Table 7 of GSTR-9
  • Only current year ITC activity belongs in Tables 6B–6H and 7A–7H

This clarification eliminates confusion around dual-year credit adjustments and ensures simplified disclosure for annual GST compliances.

Click Here To Read Advisory

Read More: If I paid GST on RCM for FY24-25 in GSTR3B of FY25-26. Should this liability and ITC of RCM be reported in GSTR 9 of FY 2024-25 or FY 2025-26?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Collections Cross Rs. 2 Lakh Crore In September 2026

India’s gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections rose 14.7% year-on-year to ₹2,03,521 crore...

Ocean Freight IGST Refund Can’t Be Denied for Payments Before Mohit Minerals Ruling: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Surat Bench, has held that refund...

ITC On Resort Construction Blocked Despite Taxable Business Use; ₹9.32 Lakh Demand Upheld: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has dismissed a resort’s...

ITC Reversal Dispute Involves Question Of Law, Can’t Be Decided Merely By Checking GST Returns: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST Collections Cross Rs. 2 Lakh Crore In September 2026

India’s gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections rose 14.7% year-on-year to ₹2,03,521 crore...

Ocean Freight IGST Refund Can’t Be Denied for Payments Before Mohit Minerals Ruling: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Surat Bench, has held that refund...

ITC On Resort Construction Blocked Despite Taxable Business Use; ₹9.32 Lakh Demand Upheld: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has dismissed a resort’s...