Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationTable 7J of GSTR-9 Not Matching Table 4C of GSTR-3B? GSTN Issues...

Table 7J of GSTR-9 Not Matching Table 4C of GSTR-3B? GSTN Issues Clarification on ITC Mismatch for FY 2024–25

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a recent clarification aimed at addressing taxpayer concerns, the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has explained why many taxpayers are noticing a mismatch between Table 7J of GSTR-9 and Table 4C of GSTR-3B for the financial year 2024–25.

According to GSTN, the difference primarily arises because Table 7J of the annual return (GSTR-9) captures only the net Input Tax Credit (ITC) pertaining to the current financial year. In contrast, Table 4C of GSTR-3B for FY 2024–25 may include ITC related to FY 2023–24, which was either claimed or reversed in the current year.

Why the Mismatch Occurs

GSTN explained that Table 7J does not consider the figures reported under Table 6A(1). As a result, taxes or credits carried forward from the previous year are not reflected in the annual return table.

On the other hand, Table 4C of GSTR-3B could contain:

  • ITC of FY 2023–24 claimed in FY 2024–25, or
  • ITC reversed or re-availed in the current year but relating to the previous period.

This structural difference in reporting leads to variations when taxpayers compare the two tables.

GSTN’s Message to Taxpayers

GSTN has clarified that such differences are normal and expected, especially in cases where businesses report previous year ITC adjustments in the new financial year’s GSTR-3B filings. Since Table 7J captures only the ITC belonging to FY 2024–25, it naturally excludes any figures from earlier years, thereby creating a mismatch with Table 4C.

What Taxpayers Should Do

Taxpayers are advised to:

  • Review their year-wise ITC reporting carefully,
  • Maintain clear records of ITC claimed or reversed pertaining to prior years, and
  • Understand that discrepancies between these tables do not necessarily indicate an error.

With many businesses reconciling their data ahead of annual return filings, the clarification provides much-needed relief and transparency.

Click Here To Read Advisory

Read More: GSTR-9C Table 12B May Trigger ITC Mismatch for FY 2024-25; GSTN Directs Taxpayers to Use Table 13 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Late Payment Interest on Industrial Gas Supplies Not Taxable as Declared Service: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Not Separately Collected Must Be Treated as Included in Consideration: CESTAT Grants Cum-Tax Benefit

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Commissioner (Appeals) Can’t Condone Service Tax Appeal Delay Beyond 1 Month After Statutory Period: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld the...

No Service Tax On Transfer of Development Rights: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has ruled that...

More like this

Late Payment Interest on Industrial Gas Supplies Not Taxable as Declared Service: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Not Separately Collected Must Be Treated as Included in Consideration: CESTAT Grants Cum-Tax Benefit

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Commissioner (Appeals) Can’t Condone Service Tax Appeal Delay Beyond 1 Month After Statutory Period: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld the...