The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court (HC) has dismissed the anticipatory bail application of popular folk singer and social activist Neha Singh Rathore. The case centers on an FIR lodged against her for allegedly posting “objectionable” content on her ‘X’ (formerly Twitter) handle following the tragic Pahalgam Terror Attack in April 2025.

The ruling by a single-judge bench of Justice Brij Raj Singh cited the singer’s alleged lack of cooperation in the police probe and the nature of her posts, which were observed to be “against the Prime Minister of India” and utilized the Prime Minister’s name in a “disrespectful manner.”

Court’s Rationale: Disrespect and Crucial Timing

The High Court delivered a detailed 14-page order, emphasizing that while Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, this right is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order and national integrity.

Justice Singh made key observations on the timing and content of the singer’s controversial tweets:

• Content Against the PM: The court observed that the posts were “primarily against the Prime Minister of India,” suggesting he visited Bihar to campaign and garner votes in the name of nationalism because “work has not been done.”
• “Crucial Time” Factor: The bench stressed that the posts were made at a “crucial time”—immediately after the unfortunate Pahalgam incident, when the “security and integrity of the country was at threat.”
• International Circulation: The State prosecution further highlighted that Rathore’s statements were circulated widely, particularly in Pakistan, where they were allegedly used to support narratives hostile to India.

The court ultimately concluded that the allegations in the FIR and the material in the case diary prima facie disclosed a cognizable offense, justifying an investigation.

Serious Charges: Endangering Sovereignty and Unity

The FIR, lodged on April 27, 2025, at Lucknow’s Hazratganj police station, covers a range of serious criminal charges, including sections of the newly implemented Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and the Information Technology Act.

The primary and most severe allegation includes provisions related to “endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India,” alongside charges of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion and caste.

Rathore’s defense, led by Senior Advocate Purnendu Chakravarty, argued that the posts constituted a protected “dissenting voice against the Government” and that voicing dissent does not equate to committing an offense against the nation. However, the High Court was not swayed by this argument at the anticipatory bail stage.

Non-Cooperation Becomes a Decisive Factor

A significant reason for the outright rejection of the plea was the singer’s alleged non-cooperation with the ongoing investigation.

• The court noted that more than seven months had passed since the FIR was registered, yet the applicant was “avoiding the police investigation” despite receiving notices and being directed by an earlier High Court bench (when it refused to quash the FIR in September 2025) to cooperate.
• The court also noted that the Supreme Court had previously refused to quash the FIR and had only permitted Rathore to raise all legal issues at the time of the framing of the charge. The HC recognized this as a binding direction under Article 141 of the Constitution.

What This Means: Immediate Arrest Threat

The rejection of the anticipatory bail application removes the legal shield preventing Rathore’s immediate arrest. The singer, a resident of Bihar, had been allowed to approach the High Court directly—bypassing the Sessions Court—under a “special circumstances” clause, due to the threat of arrest outside her local jurisdiction.

With her judicial relief exhausted at the High Court level, the next legal steps for Neha Singh Rathore include either challenging the High Court’s order in the Supreme Court or surrendering before the trial court to seek regular bail. The investigation against the singer will now proceed unhindered.

Read More: Rs. 14.50 Crore Fake Firm GST Fraud: SGST Dept. Chooses Not Arrest But To Lodge FIR