Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Disapproves of ‘Saudabazi’ in Matrimonial Case, Fixes ₹8 Lakh Alimony

Supreme Court Disapproves of ‘Saudabazi’ in Matrimonial Case, Fixes ₹8 Lakh Alimony

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has fixed a lump sum alimony of ₹8 lakh in a matrimonial dispute where the wife had sought Rs. 20 lakh from her estranged husband, a Zomato delivery boy.

The Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan questioned the wife, a graduate, on her demand. “Who asked you to seek ₹20 lakh?”

The woman responded that she wished to pursue further studies and that her husband was not working properly with Zomato.

Justice Pardiwala, however, remarked, “Dekhiye, ye saudabazi achi nahi. Ek saal mein shaadi khatam ho gayi” (See, such bargaining is not good. The marriage ended within a year).

Taking into account the circumstances, the court ruled that ₹8 lakh would be a fair settlement.

Read More: CBIC Withdraws Circular on ITC Reversal Procedure for Post-Sale Discounts

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

Income Tax Officer Can’t Use Last-Minute Valuation Reference to Extend Assessment Limitation: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an Income Tax Department reference made to the...

More like this

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...