Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeVideosVande Mataram Par Sabse Bada Bawaal! 🤯 Special Session Mein History Change?

Vande Mataram Par Sabse Bada Bawaal! 🤯 Special Session Mein History Change?

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A massive political firestorm has erupted in the Indian Parliament over the historical significance and use of the National Song, Vande Mataram. Marking its 150th anniversary, the special session devolved into a fierce confrontation when PM Modi accused the Congress party of committing a “historical mistake” in 1937 by “fragmenting” the song to appease the Muslim League. He alleged that by removing the powerful stanzas, the Congress leadership, then led by Jawaharlal Nehru, effectively sowed the “seeds of Partition.”

The Opposition immediately hit back, defending the 1937 decision as a pragmatic move toward national unity and inclusivity, citing that it was made with the counsel of figures like Rabindranath Tagore and Mahatma Gandhi to ensure the song did not hurt the sentiments of any community. This debate has quickly shifted from commemorating a national symbol to a battle over the ownership of the freedom struggle’s history. Are political leaders genuinely restoring the song’s glory, or is this a calculated move to distract from pressing issues like unemployment and inflation? Watch the full summary of the heated Parliament face-off and decide for yourself!

Read More: 8th Pay Commission Fitment Factor​ – 2026 Update

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

More like this

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...