Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeSupreme Court10-Year Jail Term in Rape Case: Supreme Court Orders Tarun Tejpal to...

10-Year Jail Term in Rape Case: Supreme Court Orders Tarun Tejpal to Surrender Within Two Weeks

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed former Tehelka editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal to surrender within two weeks in connection with the 2013 rape case. The direction came while the Court considered his plea seeking exemption from surrendering pending his challenge to the conviction and sentence imposed by the Bombay High Court.

A Bench headed by Justice Alok Aradhe declined to grant Tejpal an exemption from surrender and directed him to submit a surrender certificate. The Court has listed his appeal against the conviction and sentence for hearing on September 22, subject to compliance with the surrender direction.

Buy Now: JurisHour Ultimate Legal Research Combo – 4 Premium E-Magazines at an Unbeatable Price

Supreme Court Rejects Request for Exemption From Surrender

The immediate issue before the Supreme Court was whether Tejpal could pursue his challenge to the Bombay High Court’s judgment without first surrendering.

The Goa Government had opposed the request, arguing that Tejpal was required to surrender before seeking consideration of his appeal. During the August 24 hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Goa Government, had submitted that Tejpal should either surrender and produce a certificate confirming the same or obtain an appropriate exemption from the Court.

The Supreme Court subsequently directed Tejpal to surrender within two weeks, clearing the way for the substantive hearing of his appeal, subject to filing the surrender certificate.

Bombay High Court Had Convicted Tejpal

The proceedings before the Supreme Court arise from the Bombay High Court’s August 6, 2026 judgment in the 2013 Goa case.

The High Court overturned the acquittal previously granted to Tejpal by the trial court and convicted him in the case. It sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment.

Tejpal subsequently approached the Supreme Court challenging both his conviction and the sentence. His appeal is now scheduled to be considered on merits after compliance with the surrender requirement.

What Happens Next?

The Supreme Court’s order does not finally decide Tejpal’s challenge to his conviction. The direction presently concerns the procedural requirement of surrender before the appeal is taken up on merits.

Tejpal is required to surrender within the two-week period and place the surrender certificate before the Supreme Court. His appeal is thereafter scheduled for hearing on September 22, 2026.

The case has also seen the Goa Government approach the Supreme Court seeking enhancement of the sentence imposed by the High Court, adding another dimension to the ongoing proceedings.

Read More: Procedural Lapses Can’t Justify Harsh Punishment Without Serious Customs Breach: CESTAT Quashes Customs Broker Licence Revocation

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

CESTAT Allows Customs Duty Exemption on Reliance Industries’ Imported MEG Reclamation Plant for Petroleum Operations

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Factory Setup Services Qualify for CENVAT Credit Despite Deletion of ‘Setting Up’ From Definition: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that services...

Absence Of E-Way Bill Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling Without Proof Of Foreign Origin: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that discrepancies...

Purity Markings, Uncorroborated Retracted Statements Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that purity...

More like this

CESTAT Allows Customs Duty Exemption on Reliance Industries’ Imported MEG Reclamation Plant for Petroleum Operations

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Factory Setup Services Qualify for CENVAT Credit Despite Deletion of ‘Setting Up’ From Definition: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that services...

Absence Of E-Way Bill Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling Without Proof Of Foreign Origin: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that discrepancies...