Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsDelhi High Court Appoints Sparsh Bhargava as Nodal Counsel in Anti-Profiteering Cases

Delhi High Court Appoints Sparsh Bhargava as Nodal Counsel in Anti-Profiteering Cases

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant development in the ongoing anti-profiteering litigation, the High Court, on May 9, 2025, appointed Advocate Sparsh Bhargava as one of the nodal counsels from the petitioners’ side to oversee the sector-wise grouping of pending matters. This move aims to streamline hearings in the high-profile anti-profiteering batch matters.

Under the direction of the Court, efforts have been made to classify each pending case based on the sector involved, such as retail, FMCG, real estate, and others. While a majority of the parties and their legal representatives have submitted the necessary details to aid this classification, several matters remain unresponded.

Advocate Sparsh Bhargava has urged counsels representing parties in these unresponsive matters (list attached at the end of the article) to come forward at the earliest with the relevant sector classification and case particulars. “Since the complete list of grouped matters must be submitted to the bench today, immediate cooperation is crucial,” Bhargava stated.

He further requested that if any legal representatives are aware of the counsels acting in these cases, they should facilitate communication promptly. This collaboration will ensure comprehensive representation and procedural efficiency before the Court.

Zoheb Hossain, Standing Counsel, continues to represent the government’s side in this multifaceted litigation, while Advocate Sparsh Bhargava, now acting as one of the nodal counsels, leads the coordination efforts for the petitioners.

The High Court’s initiative to organize the matters sector-wise reflects its intent to expedite the hearings in these economically significant cases concerning alleged profiteering under GST regulations.

Read More: How To Save Money Fast On Low Income in India (2025 Guide)

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

R. 96(10) Omitted Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST SCN and Consequential Orders

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice issued under Section...

Rs. 97.26 Lakh ITC Demand Raised Through GST Refund Order Without Prior Show-Cause Process Stayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has stayed a ₹97,26,820 input tax credit (ITC) demand raised...

GSTAT Directs Deputy Commissioner to Attend Hearing After Dept. Representatives Fail to Check Taxpayer’s Reply

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi Bench has criticised departmental representatives for appearing at...

More like this

R. 96(10) Omitted Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST SCN and Consequential Orders

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice issued under Section...

Rs. 97.26 Lakh ITC Demand Raised Through GST Refund Order Without Prior Show-Cause Process Stayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has stayed a ₹97,26,820 input tax credit (ITC) demand raised...