Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSDM, SHO, DPO Summoned Over Alleged Land Grab Using Fake Warrants: Punjab...

SDM, SHO, DPO Summoned Over Alleged Land Grab Using Fake Warrants: Punjab & Haryana HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notices to several senior administrative officials in connection with an alleged attempt to illegally seize land in Jhanjheri village, Mohali, using fake possession warrants. 

The court action follows a petition filed by a local farmer, Ram Singh, who claims the land belongs to the village’s gram panchayat.

The court has directed the Additional Deputy Commissioner, SDM Kharar, District Development and Panchayat Officer (DDPO), Tehsildar Kharar, Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO) Kharar, SHO Amit Sharma, the Gram Panchayat of Jhanjheri, and one Raghu Mudgal to appear in person on July 4.

According to the petition, despite a High Court ruling affirming that specific khasra numbers are the legal property of the gram panchayat—and a subsequent resolution passed by the panchayat confirming the same—officials allegedly arrived at the site with possession warrants that cited unrelated land parcel numbers.

Ram Singh has further alleged that the attempted land grab occurred at night and was carried out under the pretext of these “fabricated” warrants. He claimed that in the aftermath, the officials unlawfully suspended the village sarpanch and four panches, and filed criminal cases against 27 farmers who opposed the move.

The High Court has taken serious note of these allegations and has sought explanations from all those involved. The matter is scheduled for hearing on July 4.

Read More: Is Rs. 2000 Note No Longer Acceptable? Truth Exposed! [READ RBI’s Official Notification]

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Interest On Delayed Return Of Seized Cash Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Tax Law Has No Express Provision: Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that income tax authorities must compensate...

GST Confiscation Order Passed Before Reply Deadline Invalid: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Rajkot Bench, has set aside a...

Incomplete E-Bike Kits Classifiable As Complete Vehicles, But Not Eligible For CKD Duty Concession: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Wrong Death Date In Official Certificate Does Not Establish Cheating Or Forgery: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case 

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman accused of furnishing an...

More like this

Interest On Delayed Return Of Seized Cash Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Tax Law Has No Express Provision: Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that income tax authorities must compensate...

GST Confiscation Order Passed Before Reply Deadline Invalid: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Rajkot Bench, has set aside a...

Incomplete E-Bike Kits Classifiable As Complete Vehicles, But Not Eligible For CKD Duty Concession: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...