Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against Tamil Director Seeman After Mutual Settlement

Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against Tamil Director Seeman After Mutual Settlement

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court quashed the rape case filed by a Tamil actress against director-producer and political leader Seeman, after both parties submitted affidavits expressing their decision to end all disputes and litigations between them.

The Bench comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan noted that the affidavits filed by the parties were “in a spirit of bringing to an end all litigation and court proceedings between them” and that “the object and purpose of filing these affidavits is to give a quietus to all controversies.”

In his affidavit, Seeman tendered an unconditional apology, withdrew all allegations made against the actress, and undertook not to attempt any form of contact with her in the future. The actress, on her part, submitted that she would withdraw her complaint and FIR against Seeman.

The Court observed that both parties had agreed to refrain from making any public statements against each other, including through media or social media platforms. Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat, appearing for the actress, submitted that members of Seeman’s political party should also not make any statements against her — to which Senior Advocate Gopal Sankarnarayanan, appearing for Seeman, assured compliance.

“The parties do not intend to continue any litigation. The respondent has also agreed not to make any statement against the appellant before any media including digital or social media,” the Bench recorded.

Justice Nagarathna, while pronouncing the order, remarked in a light-hearted vein, “Let them not make any statement under the influence of spirit,” drawing laughter in the courtroom.

Holding that “the interest of justice would be served” by putting an end to the proceedings, the Court quashed the FIR against Seeman and directed both parties to abide by their affidavits “in letter and in spirit.”

Read More: SEZ Unit To Refund Concession for Unused or Damaged Goods Under Rule 25: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

No GST Exemption In Affiliation and Annual Registration Charges For Admission Or Conduct Of Examinations: GSTAT 

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi has held that affiliation services provided by the...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 1 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 1, 2026.GSTUNSIGNED GST NOTICE HAS NO...

Custodial Interrogation Indispensable in ₹24.4 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case; Panvel Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail

The Additional Sessions Court at Panvel has rejected the anticipatory bail applications of two...

DRI Will Await Allahabad HC Orders Before Proceeding in Customs Case Linked to Stayed DGFT Action: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has disposed of a writ petition concerning the proposed continuation...

More like this

No GST Exemption In Affiliation and Annual Registration Charges For Admission Or Conduct Of Examinations: GSTAT 

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi has held that affiliation services provided by the...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 1 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 1, 2026.GSTUNSIGNED GST NOTICE HAS NO...

Custodial Interrogation Indispensable in ₹24.4 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case; Panvel Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail

The Additional Sessions Court at Panvel has rejected the anticipatory bail applications of two...