Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsPhysical Presence on Cut-Off Date Not Mandatory for Promotion Consideration After Inter...

Physical Presence on Cut-Off Date Not Mandatory for Promotion Consideration After Inter Commissionerate Transfer: Allahabad High Court

Other Laws

Published on

By Amit Sharma
Allahabad HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by the Union of India and upheld the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), directing authorities to reconsider the promotion of certain Tax Assistants who were denied advancement on the ground of not being physically present in the transferee zone on the crucial eligibility…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...
Direct Tax

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...
Direct Tax

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...
Indirect Taxes

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

More like this

Direct Tax

Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty; ₹6.26 Crore IPL Player Release Fees Also Get Tax Relief: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has held that Rs. 244.78 crore received...
Direct Tax

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...
Direct Tax

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...