Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsJustice Markandey Katju Issues Public Apology After SCWLA Condemns His “Winking” Remark...

Justice Markandey Katju Issues Public Apology After SCWLA Condemns His “Winking” Remark Against Women Lawyers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Justice Markandey Katju on Friday issued a public apology after the Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association (SCWLA) strongly condemned his controversial social media remarks suggesting that women lawyers could secure favorable judicial orders by “winking” at him.

The controversy erupted after Justice Katju, in a now-deleted post on X, wrote: “All the lady lawyers who winked at me in court got favourable orders.” Screenshots of the comment went viral, sparking outrage across the legal fraternity.

Responding swiftly, SCWLA released a strongly worded statement, terming the remarks “misogynistic, offensive, and an assault on the dignity, competence, and integrity of women in law.” The association said such comments trivialize the hard work and merit of women advocates, adding that they “erode public confidence in the impartiality of the justice system and perpetuate harmful stereotypes.”

The press release was jointly signed by SCWLA President and senior advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani along with Vice Presidents Bhakti Pasrija Sethi and Priyanka Mathur, Secretary Prernaa Singh, Executive Member Maheravish Rein, Assistant Secretary Mansa Singh, Treasurer Sudha Pal, and Assistant Treasurer Subhra Saha.

SCWLA demanded an unconditional apology and urged the wider legal community to “reject and censure regressive attitudes that undermine gender equality and the credibility of judicial institutions.”

In his apology, Justice Katju wrote: “I hereby apologize for posting on Facebook that lady lawyers who winked at me got favourable orders. It was meant as a joke, and I deleted the post soon after. However, it seems many lady lawyers felt hurt, so I apologize as demanded by the Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association.”

The association, however, said the incident was “deeply disturbing” considering Justice Katju’s stature as a former Supreme Court judge once entrusted with safeguarding constitutional values. “Coming from someone who has held such high office, the remarks are particularly shocking and unbecoming of the dignity associated with a constitutional position,” it said.

Reaffirming its commitment to equality, the SCWLA assured women lawyers that such remarks should not affect their confidence. “Our worth is defined by our intellect, integrity, and commitment to justice—not outdated sexist notions. We will not be silenced, demeaned, or reduced to caricatures,” the association declared.

Read More: DRI Seizes Drugs Worth Rs. 54 Crore Seized on Rajdhani Express Route

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...

Rs. 1,800 Shortfall in GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Can’t Defeat Appellate Remedy: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected because the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...