Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Panel Submits Inquiry Report on Justice Yashwant Varma to Chief...

Supreme Court Panel Submits Inquiry Report on Justice Yashwant Varma to Chief Justice of India

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant development, the three-member committee constituted by the Supreme Court to inquire into allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting judge of the higher judiciary, has submitted its report to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) on Sunday, May 4, 2025.

The committee, formed in accordance with the in-house procedure adopted by the Supreme Court for dealing with complaints against judges, comprises Mr Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana; Mr Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh; and Ms Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka.

According to the press release issued by the Supreme Court on Monday, May 5, 2025, the committee finalized and submitted its report dated May 3, 2025, to the CJI for appropriate consideration and further action.

The nature of the allegations against Justice Verma has not been officially disclosed.

The Chief Justice of India is expected to examine the findings of the report and determine the future course of action, which may range from closure of proceedings to further steps under the constitutional framework, depending on the committee’s conclusions.

The press release further emphasized the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining institutional integrity and accountability while upholding the dignity of the office held by members of the higher judiciary.

This marks a rare but important instance of internal judicial oversight, reflecting the judiciary’s willingness to subject its own members to scrutiny under established norms.

Read More: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Retired IAS Officer Pea Challenging Notification Relaxing Eligibility For GSTAT Technical Member Appointment

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

Income Tax Officer Can’t Use Last-Minute Valuation Reference to Extend Assessment Limitation: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an Income Tax Department reference made to the...

More like this

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...