Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsDelhi Bar Council  Warns 'Reel Lawyers' and Legal Influencers for Online Advertising

Delhi Bar Council  Warns ‘Reel Lawyers’ and Legal Influencers for Online Advertising

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bar Council of Delhi has issued a stern notice warning lawyers, particularly those active as “reel makers” and self-styled legal influencers, against advertising their legal services on social media platforms. The directive comes in response to a rising trend of advocates promoting themselves online through content aimed at soliciting clients—an act deemed unethical under professional conduct rules.

The circular, signed by Surya Prakash Khatri, Chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi, notes that many lawyers have been using personal interactions, video content, client images, and even circulars to attract business. The Bar Council called this behavior a clear violation of Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules, which strictly prohibits advocates from advertising or canvassing for legal work.

Highlighting the “steep rise” in digital misconduct, the Bar Council expressed particular concern over influencers without valid legal credentials who are spreading misinformation on critical legal issues. Such actions not only mislead the public but also damage the credibility of the legal profession, the notice stated.

“Any violation amounts to serious misconduct and can result in suspension or cancellation of an advocate’s license under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961,” the notice warned. Advocates found violating the rules may face disciplinary proceedings.

All advocates involved in such social media activity have been directed to immediately remove any promotional content. Failure to comply may invite strict action under the provisions of the Advocates Act.

Read More: Justice (Retd.) Mayank Kumar Jain Appointed as Judicial Member at Principal Bench, GSTAT, New Delhi

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Profit From Purchase and Sale of Cargo Space Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Difference Between Balance Sheet and ST-3 Returns: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has ruled that a...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Valuation Does Not Bar Statutory Appeal: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has ruled that an...

Foreign Supplier’s ‘Packing Mistake’ Can’t Explain Undeclared Branded Goods in Import Consignment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that an...

More like this

Profit From Purchase and Sale of Cargo Space Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Difference Between Balance Sheet and ST-3 Returns: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has ruled that a...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Valuation Does Not Bar Statutory Appeal: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has ruled that an...