Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsRajasthan High Court Suo Moto Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against RUHS Over Withheld...

Rajasthan High Court Suo Moto Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against RUHS Over Withheld Affiliation for Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan High Court has initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS) for failing to grant affiliation to the Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences despite a previous court order.

The Single Bench of Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur took strong exception to RUHS’s inaction, stating that the university had failed to comply with the court’s directive issued on August 27, 2024. The court noted that the petitioner institution had met all eligibility criteria and that the university’s refusal to grant affiliation was arbitrary and unjustified.

The bench observed, “The respondent RUHS is bent upon harassing the petitioner-institution without any valid reason. This is a fit case for suo-motu contempt proceedings.”

The Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences had filed a writ petition demanding further rounds of B.Sc. Nursing admissions for the 2024-25 session, permission to admit students directly in case of vacant seats. Allocation of students by the Private Federation to ensure full occupancy. Grant of affiliation for the academic session 2024-25 and beyond.

Despite clear court orders favoring the petitioner, RUHS failed to act, leading to unnecessary financial and academic losses for the institute.

The court emphasized that RUHS’s inaction had caused five vacant seats at the petitioner’s institution, resulting in financial damage. The university’s delay in listing the institution for counseling rounds was deemed a deliberate attempt to obstruct its operations.

The High Court has directed the Registrar of RUHS to appear and provide an explanation for the non-compliance. A contempt notice has been issued, and the matter is scheduled for hearing on March 25, 2025.

Case Details

Case Title: Saloni Institute Of Medical Sciences Versus The State Of Rajasthan

Case No.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1480/2025

Date: 25/02/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Shreyansh Mardia

Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Mahendra Bishnoi

Read More: Digital Transformation of Justice: Integrating AI in Indian Judiciary and Law Enforcement 

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...