HomeOther LawsContempt Of Courts (Delhi High Court) Rules, 2025: All You Need To...

Contempt Of Courts (Delhi High Court) Rules, 2025: All You Need To Know

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court notified the Contempt Of Courts (Delhi High Court) Rules, 2025 to regulate contempt proceedings for itself and subordinate courts.

As per the Rules if the High Court finds a person guilty of contempt in its presence or hearing, it may detain them and, before the Court rises or as soon as possible, inform them in writing of the charge (as per Form-I), provide an opportunity for defense, consider evidence, hear the accused, and decide on the charge. 

The Court will then pass an order as per Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. If the accused requests, either verbally or in writing, to be tried by a different Judge, and the Court deems it appropriate, the matter will be placed before the Chief Justice, who may assign it to an appropriate Bench, typically a Division Bench unless a larger Bench is necessary. 

Pending the decision, the Court may detain the accused, but bail can be granted with or without sureties, ensuring their attendance at future hearings. 

If another Bench conducts the trial, the Judge(s) before whom the contempt occurred will not need to testify, and the written statement submitted to the Chief Justice will serve as evidence.

As per the rules the High Court may take cognizance of civil contempt in the following cases: on a petition filed by an aggrieved party, based on information submitted by the Registrar General, upon a reference from a district court in cases of civil contempt, or on its own (suo motu).

The High Court may take cognizance of criminal contempt, other than contempt in its presence, in the following ways: on the motion or recommendation of the Law Officer, on the motion of any other person with prior written consent of the Law Officer, on a reference under Section 15(2) of the Act from a district court or an application received by the High Court, on information from the Registrar General or any other person, or on its own (suo motu). 

However, no contempt proceedings shall be initiated after one year from the date of the alleged contempt. If the information comes from a person not mentioned in Section 15 of the Act, including the Registrar General, the procedure outlined in Rule 9(3) shall be followed.

Read More: ARREST – THE RIGHT BALANCE by A. Rangadham, Superintendent (AR)

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : April 28, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 28, 2026.GSTGST ALREADY INCLUDED IN “CONTRACT”...

Corporate Guarantees Constitute ‘Financial Debt’ Under IBC; Supreme Court Quashes NCLAT Orders Denying Financial Creditor Status

The Supreme Court has held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees squarely fall within...

Schools Can’t Refuse Admission to State-Allotted Students Under RTE; Right to Education Must Be Enforced in Letter and Spirit

While reinforcing the mandate of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education...

Supreme Court Acquits 16 Accused in Brutal Murder Case Citing “Scripted Investigation”, Procedural Lapses

The Supreme Court of India acquitted multiple accused persons in a brutal murder case,...

More like this

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : April 28, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 28, 2026.GSTGST ALREADY INCLUDED IN “CONTRACT”...

Corporate Guarantees Constitute ‘Financial Debt’ Under IBC; Supreme Court Quashes NCLAT Orders Denying Financial Creditor Status

The Supreme Court has held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees squarely fall within...

Schools Can’t Refuse Admission to State-Allotted Students Under RTE; Right to Education Must Be Enforced in Letter and Spirit

While reinforcing the mandate of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education...