HomeOther LawsCBI Files Appeal in Delhi High Court Against Discharge of Accused in...

CBI Files Appeal in Delhi High Court Against Discharge of Accused in Delhi Excise Policy Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has moved the Delhi High Court challenging the recent order of a Delhi trial court that discharged all 23 accused in the alleged Delhi excise policy case, including Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, and Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader K. Kavitha.

Sources within the agency said the appeal has been filed promptly, contending that the trial court failed to adequately consider several crucial aspects of the investigation. The CBI is understood to have argued that key evidentiary materials and findings were either overlooked or not properly appreciated while passing the discharge order.

The development comes after the Rouse Avenue Court, presided over by Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) Jitender Singh, discharged all the accused, holding that there was no material to substantiate allegations of criminal conspiracy or misconduct in the formulation and implementation of the Delhi excise policy.

In its order, the court observed that the prosecution had not been able to establish the existence of any overarching conspiracy or criminal intent behind the policy decisions. The judge concluded that the evidence on record did not meet the threshold required to frame charges, leading to the closure of the case initiated by the CBI.

Apart from Kejriwal, Sisodia, and Kavitha, other accused who were discharged include Bijay Nair, Durgesh Pathak and several others named in the FIR.

The case originated from a complaint lodged in 2022 by Delhi Lieutenant Governor V.K. Saxena, following which the CBI registered a First Information Report and launched an investigation into alleged irregularities in the now-scrapped excise policy.

With the CBI’s appeal now before the Delhi High Court, the matter is set to enter a new legal phase, where the higher judiciary will examine the validity of the trial court’s findings and determine whether the discharge order warrants interference.

Read More: Rs. 23.93 Crore Worth of Suspected Ganja Seized at IGI Airport; 2 Passengers Arrested

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

28% GST on Online Gaming, Fantasy Sports and Betting Platforms: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Goods and Services Tax (GST)...

Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Deposit Made During Investigation Was Not Marked ‘Under Protest’: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Dept. Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

28% GST on Online Gaming, Fantasy Sports and Betting Platforms: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Goods and Services Tax (GST)...

Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Deposit Made During Investigation Was Not Marked ‘Under Protest’: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...