HomeOther LawsBSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI...

BSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch & Others

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has temporarily stayed the registration of an FIR against former SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and other top officials in an alleged BSE listing fraud case. The case involves financial fraud, insider trading, and regulatory violations related to the listing of a company on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) in 1994.

Justice SG Dige, while hearing the urgent plea, directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) not to act on the special court order until the next hearing. The matter will be taken up for further arguments tomorrow.

FIR was ordered by Special Judge Shashikant Eknathrao Bangar against Buch, three SEBI whole-time directors (Ashwani Bhatia, Ananth Narayan G, Kamlesh Chandra Varshney), and two BSE officials (Pramod Agarwal & Sundararaman Ramamurthy).

The complaint, filed by journalist Sapan Shrivastava, alleges regulatory lapses, market manipulation, and insider trading in violation of the SEBI Act, ICDR Regulations, LODR Regulations, and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The court found a prima facie case and ordered a probe due to the alleged inaction by SEBI and law enforcement agencies.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the SEBI officials, while Senior Advocate Amit Desai appeared for the BSE executives.

Read More: ICMAI Issues Advisory Against Unauthorized Activities Affecting Institute’s Integrity

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...