HomeDirect TaxRefund of Loan Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit; Additions Based...

Refund of Loan Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit; Additions Based Solely on Statements Without Evidence Not Sustainable: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against M/s Minda Capital Pvt. Ltd., holding that refund of a loan cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.  The bench of Mahavir Singh (Vice President) and Manish Agarwal (Accountant Member) has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITAT Upholds Allowability of Advertisement Reimbursement and JV-Linked Expenses; Allows Proportionate Retainership Fees

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed multiple contentious issues...

Under-Construction Property Qualifies as ‘Construction’: ITAT Allows S. 54F Deduction

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that investment...

31 Software Development Units Of HCL Technologies Can’t Be Treated as Separate Undertakings for S. 10A Deduction: ITAT 

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that multiple...

More like this

ITAT Upholds Allowability of Advertisement Reimbursement and JV-Linked Expenses; Allows Proportionate Retainership Fees

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed multiple contentious issues...

Under-Construction Property Qualifies as ‘Construction’: ITAT Allows S. 54F Deduction

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that investment...